The Breitling Watch Source Forums

Breitling Watch Information Forums, Navitimer, Chronomat
It is currently Mon May 05, 2025 11:16 am

All times are UTC - 8 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 17 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sat Aug 08, 2009 9:49 pm 
Offline
Breitling Enthusiast
Breitling Enthusiast

Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2009 1:51 am
Posts: 11
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 0 post
A question for any of the Breitling experts out there: What grade of steel does Breitling use of their cases and bracelets? I know that Rolex harp on about using their own derived highly corrosive resistant stainless steel 904L grade and that surgical stainless steel is 316L. Does Breitling use 316L or anything different?

Gabriel

_________________
BREITLING Colt Automatic II


Last edited by Gabriel on Sun Aug 09, 2009 12:23 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sat Aug 08, 2009 11:54 pm 
Offline
Breitling Fanatic
Breitling Fanatic

Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2008 8:02 am
Posts: 179
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 0 post
316 is a likely candidate but probably more so for its superior anti-magnetic property over many other SS alloys.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sun Aug 09, 2009 3:09 am 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 21, 2007 11:05 am
Posts: 12682
Likes: 186 posts
Liked in: 72 posts
Location: Zagreb, Croatia
Gabriel wrote:
Does Breitling use 316L or anything different?

They use 316L.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sun Aug 09, 2009 3:10 am 
Offline
King of Ling
King of Ling

Joined: Wed Jan 30, 2008 6:44 am
Posts: 1724
Likes: 1 post
Liked in: 0 post
Location: Sunny Bath
As Bn said.

_________________
Al

“Quis custodiet ipsos custodes"


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sun Aug 09, 2009 4:44 am 
Offline
Contributing Moderator
Contributing Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 5:09 am
Posts: 36521
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 489 posts
Location: Ontario, Canada
I don't quite get the Rolex 904L - questionable improvement over 316L and significantly more expensive.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sun Aug 09, 2009 4:48 am 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 29, 2008 4:33 am
Posts: 1618
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 0 post
Location: CANADA: HABS-TOWN
Roffensian wrote:
I don't quite get the Rolex 904L - questionable improvement over 316L and significantly more expensive.

I read somewhere that the Rolex steel has less nickel content which is good for people with allergies. It's probably all marketing.

_________________
Rolex DeepSea, GMT Master II TT, Pres 18038, DJ TT 16013
Breitling Chronomat 39mm (bullet+UTC), Starliner SS/MOP (wife)

back with ROLEX


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sun Aug 09, 2009 7:51 am 
Offline
Breitling Fanatic
Breitling Fanatic
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 22, 2009 5:28 pm
Posts: 459
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 0 post
Location: Jersey Shore
Can anyone explain or point me to a post that explains what the numbers 916L nad 904L mean? Thanks in advance!

_________________
Image Image
SA Blue Dial Silver Subs Pro 2


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sun Aug 09, 2009 9:28 am 
Offline
Contributing Moderator
Contributing Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 5:09 am
Posts: 36521
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 489 posts
Location: Ontario, Canada
Jefferson wrote:
Can anyone explain or point me to a post that explains what the numbers 916L nad 904L mean? Thanks in advance!


Not 916, 316.

There are 'series' of stainless steel - each indicated by the first digit - 3xx are all austentic chromium nickel alloys, I'm not sure whal the 9xx series is. As far as I know the last two digits are just sequential variations.

The L is an indication of low carbon (less than 0.03%)


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Aug 10, 2009 2:17 am 
Offline
Contributing Moderator
Contributing Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 24, 2007 11:39 am
Posts: 12837
Likes: 148 posts
Liked in: 520 posts
Location: UK
Spartan wrote:
Roffensian wrote:
I don't quite get the Rolex 904L - questionable improvement over 316L and significantly more expensive.

I read somewhere that the Rolex steel has less nickel content which is good for people with allergies. It's probably all marketing.

904L actually has a much higher nickel content that 316L which makes it bad for people with nickel allergies. Nickel is pretty expensive, and along with molybdenum, it's these elements that push the price up. It's actually a very industrial steel, with primary uses in plant equipment that is used in highly corrosive environments - e.g. sulphuric acids plants, industrial scale gas scrubbers, etc.

Apart from the higher corrosion resistance (which would be the least of your worries if your arm was in a bath of sulphuric acid!), 904L is also a little more scratch resistant, but not really enough to justify the additional expense. It's over-engineering basically. I certainly don't have a problem with that at all, but that's essentially all it is.

_________________
Driver8

Site Moderator
Image


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sat Aug 15, 2009 7:09 am 
Offline
Breitling Fanatic
Breitling Fanatic

Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2008 7:12 pm
Posts: 324
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 0 post
Due to the higher nickel and chromium content of 904L its a much brighter steel. You can really see the difference between the steel Rolex uses and the steel Breitling uses when they are side by side. (Im looking at my Seawolf and Seadweller next to eachother right now.) This might be the fact that I have a gray dial on my Seawolf which could be dulling the contrast between dial and case/bracelet, but I can definitely see a difference in the bracelets. Funny thing is when compared to my Skyland (High Polished) they dont look that different at all.

If Im honest the 904L really seems to be Rolex saying we are better than everyone else because of this....(insert Rolex marketing hype here)-In this case different steel than everyone.

Vacheron Constantin, Audemars, Blancpain, Breguet and many others all use 316L for their steel models, so really is 904L that much better? If it were, wouldnt all the top names use it too? Id say no its probably not better for the wear a watch will see. Is it different than everyone else? Certainly, which Rolex translates into a form exclusivity in their Ads. I will say its definitely (in my eyes) brighter though.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sat Aug 15, 2009 9:17 am 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 29, 2008 4:33 am
Posts: 1618
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 0 post
Location: CANADA: HABS-TOWN
Quote:
(Im looking at my Seawolf and Seadweller next to eachother right now.)


Can you please share a picture with us?
We are starving for pictures, around here :wink:

_________________
Rolex DeepSea, GMT Master II TT, Pres 18038, DJ TT 16013
Breitling Chronomat 39mm (bullet+UTC), Starliner SS/MOP (wife)

back with ROLEX


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sat Aug 15, 2009 11:47 am 
Offline
Breitling Fanatic
Breitling Fanatic

Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2008 7:12 pm
Posts: 324
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 0 post
Sorry Spartan, I managed to snap some quick shots but the battery has died on my camera and I cant find the charger. The minute I do Ill post some to show the difference.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Nov 23, 2015 9:22 am 
Offline
Breitling Newbie
Breitling Newbie

Joined: Mon Nov 23, 2015 9:15 am
Posts: 1
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 0 post
Ive owned Rolex's and TAGS's and hey both use 316 and 904 respectively. I was considering a Breitling and wanted to know the grade of steel that they use and came across this thread. I wear my watches while working out- with cycling being my preferred form. With the TAG I get a nasty gray residue on my wrist, with the Rolex, I do not. Obviously the chemical composure of my perspiration works best with the Rolex. Ive also been known to have an issue with mineral depletion with long hard workout efforts.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Nov 23, 2015 9:36 am 
Offline
Contributing Moderator
Contributing Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 24, 2007 11:39 am
Posts: 12837
Likes: 148 posts
Liked in: 520 posts
Location: UK
Holy old threads Batman!

lsw123071 wrote:
Ive owned Rolex's and TAGS's and hey both use 316 and 904 respectively.

Other way round - Rolex uses 904L while TAG uses 316L.

_________________
Driver8

Site Moderator
Image


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Nov 23, 2015 10:36 am 
Offline
Breitling Fanatic
Breitling Fanatic

Joined: Thu Nov 17, 2011 9:42 am
Posts: 245
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 62 posts
Roffensian wrote:
I don't quite get the Rolex 904L - questionable improvement over 316L and significantly more expensive.


I believe it was due to older submariners having corrosion/rust on the inside of the case back from many years in salt water, so the 904L is far more anti corrosive, and goes well with the 'Oyster Perpetual' tag line.

_________________
Rolex Daytona Panda Dial 116509 40mm
Breitling Chronomat GMT Limited AB0412 47mm
Tag Heuer Link Chrono Auto CJF2110 42mm


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 17 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC - 8 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 54 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
 




Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group