The Breitling Watch Source Forums

Breitling Watch Information Forums, Navitimer, Chronomat
It is currently Tue May 06, 2025 2:11 pm

All times are UTC - 8 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 16 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Is this true?
PostPosted: Fri Jan 02, 2009 1:02 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 29, 2008 4:33 am
Posts: 1618
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 0 post
Location: CANADA: HABS-TOWN
I was looking at my Chronolog 2009 book and noticed something bizarre
(page 188); the Avenger Seawolf weighs ~6 grams more than the
Super Avenger!!!
Is this true??? :?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Is this true?
PostPosted: Fri Jan 02, 2009 1:46 pm 
Offline
Contributing Moderator
Contributing Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 5:09 am
Posts: 36521
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 489 posts
Location: Ontario, Canada
Spartan wrote:
I was looking at my Chronolog 2009 book and noticed something bizarre
(page 188); the Avenger Seawolf weighs ~6 grams more than the
Super Avenger!!!
Is this true??? :?


It's entirely possible - the old one (Ti) was over 100 grams, so 160 grams is consistent. The additional structural integrity to the case that's needed for the extreme water resistance adds metal and therefore weight.

I guess we need someone with both to weight them :wink:


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jan 02, 2009 1:55 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 29, 2008 4:33 am
Posts: 1618
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 0 post
Location: CANADA: HABS-TOWN
Quote:
I guess we need someone with both to weight them


we are assuming that Breitling already did that with the utmost accuracy :roll:


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jan 02, 2009 3:42 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 22, 2008 1:37 pm
Posts: 5125
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 1 post
Location: Sin City - Vegas Baby!
Wow, weird.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jan 02, 2009 3:46 pm 
Offline
Contributing Moderator
Contributing Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 5:09 am
Posts: 36521
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 489 posts
Location: Ontario, Canada
In2Deep wrote:
Wow, weird.


Why?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jan 03, 2009 6:25 am 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 29, 2008 4:33 am
Posts: 1618
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 0 post
Location: CANADA: HABS-TOWN
Quote:
Why?


isnt the SA supposed to be the biggest (hence heaviest) Breitling out there? :?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jan 03, 2009 6:29 am 
Offline
Contributing Moderator
Contributing Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 5:09 am
Posts: 36521
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 489 posts
Location: Ontario, Canada
Spartan wrote:
Quote:
Why?


isnt the SA supposed to be the biggest (hence heaviest) Breitling out there? :?


No.

Chronomatic 49 is, well, 49mm and any number of Bentleys are 48.7mm

SA is 48.4mm


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jan 03, 2009 6:40 am 
Offline
Contributing Moderator
Contributing Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 24, 2007 11:39 am
Posts: 12837
Likes: 148 posts
Liked in: 520 posts
Location: UK
Spartan wrote:
Quote:
Why?


isnt the SA supposed to be the biggest (hence heaviest) Breitling out there? :?

The SA is the biggest Aeromarine model externally, but it's water resistance is only a 10th of the Seawolf, so it doesn't need to be able to resist such huge pressures..... and hence it doesn't need so much metal in the case. I guess the Seawolf case is thicker, which would make eminent sense to me. Also bear in mind the Rolex Seadweller Deepsea is only 43mm in diameter yet WR to 3900m. External dimensions bear no relation to pressure resistance and thickess of case.

Just for info, for every additional 10 foot (approx 3m) you descend under the sea, the pressure increases by approximately 4.4 pounds per square inch. The difference in capability between the SA and Seawolf in terms of pressure resistance is A LOT............. hence a thicker and undoubtedly heavier case.

_________________
Driver8

Site Moderator
Image


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jan 03, 2009 6:53 am 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 29, 2008 4:33 am
Posts: 1618
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 0 post
Location: CANADA: HABS-TOWN
now it all makes a little bit more sense....thanks for the wonderful reply


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jan 03, 2009 6:59 am 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 29, 2008 4:33 am
Posts: 1618
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 0 post
Location: CANADA: HABS-TOWN
Quote:
Chronomatic 49 is, well, 49mm and any number of Bentleys are 48.7mm


The other day I was at my AD and I did a side-by-side comparison of my BlackSteel Skyland with a 6.75 Bentley (on a leather strap).
I could not really see thaaaat much of a difference.
I am assuming the thickness of a watch also plays a role in the "BIGGER" factor


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jan 03, 2009 7:06 am 
Offline
Contributing Moderator
Contributing Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 24, 2007 11:39 am
Posts: 12837
Likes: 148 posts
Liked in: 520 posts
Location: UK
Spartan wrote:
Quote:
Chronomatic 49 is, well, 49mm and any number of Bentleys are 48.7mm


The other day I was at my AD and I did a side-by-side comparison of my BlackSteel Skyland with a 6.75 Bentley (on a leather strap).
I could not really see thaaaat much of a difference.
I am assuming the thickness of a watch also plays a role in the "BIGGER" factor

Maybe thickness has something to do with it, but generally Breitling always refer to the diameter of a watch when they are talking about size. i.e. if one is 0.0001mm bigger in diameter, then technically speaking it IS bigger than one that is 0.0001mm smaller. Visually there may not be much in it, but I guess it's the absolute figures that count in this case.

_________________
Driver8

Site Moderator
Image


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jan 03, 2009 7:22 am 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 22, 2008 1:37 pm
Posts: 5125
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 1 post
Location: Sin City - Vegas Baby!
Roffensian wrote:
In2Deep wrote:
Wow, weird.


Why?


The Emergency Mission use to hold that title. I guess I expected something else would take the spot though I never put too much thought into it.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jan 03, 2009 10:57 am 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member

Joined: Thu May 29, 2008 5:44 am
Posts: 181
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 0 post
Location: Canada
the blackbird is also significantly heavier than the SA from my experience. i guess this is also due to the water resistance?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jan 03, 2009 11:05 am 
Offline
Contributing Moderator
Contributing Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 5:09 am
Posts: 36521
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 489 posts
Location: Ontario, Canada
siglo vi wrote:
the blackbird is also significantly heavier than the SA from my experience. i guess this is also due to the water resistance?


Blackbird is 30 grams lighter than the SA and WR is the same - 300 metres.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jan 03, 2009 1:35 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member

Joined: Thu May 29, 2008 5:44 am
Posts: 181
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 0 post
Location: Canada
Roffensian wrote:
siglo vi wrote:
the blackbird is also significantly heavier than the SA from my experience. i guess this is also due to the water resistance?


Blackbird is 30 grams lighter than the SA and WR is the same - 300 metres.


wow i stand corrected. for some reason my blackbird feels heavier on the wrist than an SA or bentley motors.. perhaps due to the density/weight distribution? any idea how the motors weighs in compared to the SA?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 16 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC - 8 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 95 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
 




Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group