The Breitling Watch Source Forums

Breitling Watch Information Forums, Navitimer, Chronomat
It is currently Sun May 04, 2025 6:27 am

All times are UTC - 8 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 22 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun Mar 08, 2009 2:01 pm 
Offline
Breitling Enthusiast
Breitling Enthusiast

Joined: Sun Mar 08, 2009 1:47 pm
Posts: 13
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 0 post
I have viewed many sites to ascertain year model and value of a Navitimer that my father gave to me. It is a self wind model, and works flawlessly. Any help is appreciated. Photo attached. There are two numbers on the back one is 1428598 and the other (little larger font) is 8808. Thanks,

Attachment:
DSCN0187.JPG


You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sun Mar 08, 2009 3:12 pm 
Offline
Contributing Moderator
Contributing Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 5:09 am
Posts: 36521
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 489 posts
Location: Ontario, Canada
The serial number (1428598), dates it to early 1974. 8808 is the model number.

However, there's a problem. This isn't an 8808.

The 8808 is a Chrono-matic from the 1970s with an automatic movement. It had two subdials and a date window at 6 o'clock. It also had the Chrono-matic left hand crown.

I'd like to know more about the history of this before commenting further - the dial layout is of a 7806, but that was powered by a Valjoux 7740 (manual wind). The hands are also wrong for that (except for the 6 o'clock sub). The hands are right for a 7808, but again that's a manual wind and it's a Chronomat, not a Navitimer. The hand at the 9 o'clock sub is also too short.

Sorry, but this watch has problems.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sun Mar 08, 2009 4:15 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 21, 2007 11:05 am
Posts: 12682
Likes: 186 posts
Liked in: 72 posts
Location: Zagreb, Croatia
It looks like 7806 with wrong hands.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sun Mar 08, 2009 7:46 pm 
Offline
Breitling Enthusiast
Breitling Enthusiast

Joined: Sun Mar 08, 2009 1:47 pm
Posts: 13
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 0 post
Roff, what else would you like to know? It definately says 8808 and serial 1426598. I took the back off and the movement says Breitling Watch Ltd. Cal. 7740. Also, there is a plug on the left side where it looks like the crown could be inserted if it weren't on the right side. Any ideas?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sun Mar 08, 2009 7:54 pm 
Offline
Breitling Enthusiast
Breitling Enthusiast

Joined: Sun Mar 08, 2009 1:47 pm
Posts: 13
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 0 post
Roff, the serial number is 1426598 instead of 1428598. Sorry for the bad number.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Mar 09, 2009 5:08 am 
Offline
Contributing Moderator
Contributing Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 5:09 am
Posts: 36521
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 489 posts
Location: Ontario, Canada
OK now I'm confused.

It does indeed look like a 7806 with the wrong hands bnewbie, but the OP said it was self winding.

lead47 - can you post a picture of the movement - a 7740 is manual wind, not automatic. I'd also like to see pictures of the inside and outside of the caseback.

Revised serial makes it very late 1973.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Mar 09, 2009 7:04 pm 
Offline
Breitling Enthusiast
Breitling Enthusiast

Joined: Sun Mar 08, 2009 1:47 pm
Posts: 13
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 0 post
Roffen, I am having difficulty taking close-up pictures with old camera but will attempt again tomorrow night at which time I will have my better camera. The movement is indeed a self-wind Cal. 7740. I will post more pictures tomorrow night. Thanks for your patience.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Mar 10, 2009 4:05 pm 
Offline
Contributing Moderator
Contributing Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 5:09 am
Posts: 36521
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 489 posts
Location: Ontario, Canada
lead47 wrote:
Roffen, I am having difficulty taking close-up pictures with old camera but will attempt again tomorrow night at which time I will have my better camera. The movement is indeed a self-wind Cal. 7740. I will post more pictures tomorrow night. Thanks for your patience.


No worries.

And just to clarify - you have a 7740 automatic - i.e. with a rotor?????????????

I really want to see that.

The 7740 is essentially the same as the Breitling calibre 12, but with one key difference - it doesn't have a rotor - it's manual wind not automatic / self winding.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Mar 10, 2009 7:59 pm 
Offline
Breitling Enthusiast
Breitling Enthusiast

Joined: Sun Mar 08, 2009 1:47 pm
Posts: 13
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 0 post
Sorry Roffen, I meant that I have to wind it by my self, my 7740 is not an automatic. Here are more pictures that show the serial number, model number, movement, and left side plug for crown that I mentioned earlier.


You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Mar 10, 2009 8:22 pm 
Offline
Breitling Enthusiast
Breitling Enthusiast

Joined: Sun Mar 08, 2009 1:47 pm
Posts: 13
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 0 post
Here are a few more pics. There is a number inscribed on the inside of the watch back/movement cover on top, above the Breitling Watch LTD inscription. Under magnification, it looks like 50193ERK.


You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Mar 11, 2009 4:45 am 
Offline
Contributing Moderator
Contributing Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 5:09 am
Posts: 36521
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 489 posts
Location: Ontario, Canada
Well, it looks to me like there are at least two watches that have contributed to this - it's definitely not an original piece.

You appear to have the case, caseback and most of the hands from an 8808, and the movement (which is a correct 7740), dial, and 6 o'clock subdial hand from a 7806. Both are early 70s watches, but this watch has been constructed at some point in the past. I don't doubt that it's all genuine Breitling, but it's not an original watch - sorry.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Mar 12, 2009 3:08 pm 
Offline
Breitling Enthusiast
Breitling Enthusiast

Joined: Sun Mar 08, 2009 1:47 pm
Posts: 13
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 0 post
Thanks Roffen. I have a couple of questions...is it normal for a case of this vintage to have the plug on the left side? Also, looking closely at the inside of the case, it looks like it was cast and designed for either a left or right crown stem option. Looking at other pictures of 8808's and 7806's on the internet, neither have a "plug" on the opposite side for the left or right crown option, as my watch does. Also, where do the red hands on the 3 and 9 o'clock sub dials, and the sweep second hand fit into the puzzle? I haven't yet found a Breitling that has the red hands. Thanks,


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Mar 12, 2009 4:07 pm 
Offline
Contributing Moderator
Contributing Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 5:09 am
Posts: 36521
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 489 posts
Location: Ontario, Canada
lead47 wrote:
Thanks Roffen. I have a couple of questions...is it normal for a case of this vintage to have the plug on the left side? Also, looking closely at the inside of the case, it looks like it was cast and designed for either a left or right crown stem option. Looking at other pictures of 8808's and 7806's on the internet, neither have a "plug" on the opposite side for the left or right crown option, as my watch does. Also, where do the red hands on the 3 and 9 o'clock sub dials, and the sweep second hand fit into the puzzle? I haven't yet found a Breitling that has the red hands. Thanks,


There are a lot of 70s Chronomats / Chronomatics with red hands, black hands and some of each - they are definitely Breitling hands. There are also cases that have plugged left hand (or right hand) crown castings as the Navitimers / Chronomats / Chronomatics shared cases.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Mar 12, 2009 6:13 pm 
Offline
Breitling Enthusiast
Breitling Enthusiast

Joined: Sun Mar 08, 2009 1:47 pm
Posts: 13
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 0 post
Thanks Roffen.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sun Apr 14, 2013 4:27 pm 
Offline
Breitling Enthusiast
Breitling Enthusiast

Joined: Sun Mar 08, 2009 1:47 pm
Posts: 13
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 0 post
Hello all,

It has been a few years since my last post about my vintage Breitling Ref. 8808 Navitimer, but I would really like some closure on the authenticity of my watch. Just today, I ran across these three Breitling Navitimer Ref. 8808 watches on the sites listed below. These watches are IDENTICAL to my Breitling Ref. 8808....same sub-dials, same hands, same case plug on left side, same elongated mark on the case back under "Stainless Steel", same everything. You can see in the photos that they are Ref. 8808's with a Cal. 7740 manual wind movement. According to some internet searches, most 8808's had an automatic movement. In my earlier posts, I mentioned that my watch had a self winding movement however, I was wrong. My watch has a Manual Wind Cal. 7740 movement. I apologize for any confusion that this might have generated. Any thoughts about these watches is greatly appreciated. Thanks,

http://www.chrono24.com/en/breitling/na ... 0&tab=pics
http://www.chrono24.com/en/breitling/na ... 0&tab=pics
http://www.bachmann-scher.de/en/breitli ... -3650.html


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 22 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC - 8 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
 




Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group