The Breitling Watch Source Forums

Breitling Watch Information Forums, Navitimer, Chronomat
It is currently Sat May 03, 2025 2:50 pm

All times are UTC - 8 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Dec 20, 2012 3:04 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 10, 2011 4:10 pm
Posts: 186
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 7 posts
Location: Winnipeg, Manitoba
I saw a Breitling Code Yellow for sale in the sales corner on TZ. I was very interested in the watch so I downloaded the photos the seller had made available to my PC so I could use my photo viewer to zoom in on the watch to judge the condition of the piece. My photo viewer also has a feature that allows you to read the imbedded EXIF data that normally accompanies ever photo. The EXIF data revealed that the photos were taken February, 10 months ago. A watch can certainly accumulate much wear and tear in the span of 10 months.

Good idea to check the date the pictures were taken on ads.

_________________
Breitling Avenger II Seawolf
Breitling Aerospace EVO
Breitling Chronospace EVO Night Mission
Breitling Chronomat 44 Airborne
Breitling SuperOcean 42 Chronograph
Rolex SD43 126600
Rolex Submariner 116610LN
Rolex Explorer I 214270
Rolex Explorer II 216570


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Dec 27, 2012 2:36 pm 
Offline
King of Ling
King of Ling
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2011 3:49 am
Posts: 1536
Likes: 22 posts
Liked in: 28 posts
Yes, thats a good point. I always ignore offers on watches with factory pics, unless the seller can issue actual pics that are current. The idea of checking a photo date is a good one. If an actual pic is too old, then anything can happen in the meantime.

Had an offer on a Breitling last week, that frankly seemed to be camera shy on one side. On asking for extra pics I saw that the side not photograghed originally was indeed not to standard spec. No allegations against the seller, but suspicion on my part thankfully got the better of me. So I did not buy as it would have been more trouble to fix than pass by for a more expoensive offer eslewhere. So you can get caught.

I believe that if you follow the guides on this forum and buy the buyer first, you stand an even chance of getting the confirmation you need before buying or by passing.

Reading the embedded file data. What viewer are you using?

Jim

_________________
Jim

"You have Control".


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Dec 27, 2012 5:14 pm 
Offline
Breitling Connoisseur
Breitling Connoisseur
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2012 3:44 am
Posts: 682
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 1 post
I get a lot of 'sellers' who send me pics of other people's listings and claims it is their own, most overseas and wanting MoneyGram or another scam-central payment. The best way IMO to prevent your pics being reused is something like this...I borrowed a pic from BS for this. While this isn't the best method to show you have the watch (actual piece of paper next to the watch is best IMO, it make sure someone doesn't use Adobe Illustrator to take your watch, butcher the photo, and scam someone with it. I generally put these marks over areas that would be critical for a scammer to use, such as making contact with the logo, writing, bracelet, engraved model and SN, etc.


You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 8 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
 




Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group