The Breitling Watch Source Forums

Hey guys im interested in this watch and was wondering if it was indeed a watch Tiffany produced and any other information on it would be great!

http://www.ebay.com/itm/160853619286?ss ... 1426.l2649

Thanks again!

Kyle

That is very interesting. I know that Tiffany used to sell Rolexes with their stamp on the dial including Submariners but never have I seen a Tiffany "sub".

_________________
"I don't got the bright watch I got the right watch" -Jay Z

Exactly! Thats all i could find online as well! So is this one real or not? I Like it because apparently its a mechanical movement.....

Even if it real the watch is in terrible condition and it is positively hideous to look at. As a man, I wouldn't be caught dead wearing anything Tiffany.

_________________
"I became insane, with long intervals of horrible sanity."
2012 GShock 5I Mudman
2012 Breitling Colt 44
2011 Breitling Transocean chrono mercury silver
2011 Rolex Submariner 14060M
2010 Omega Planet Ocean XL
1979 Rolex Date Just two tone

Well that's just your opinion, the watch can be cleaned up, I just need to know wither or not its authentic

Ive honestly got no clue, but my gut tells me that its 10000000000000% fake.

_________________
-RJ

Any one else have any info????

I've no info, but this is definitely not a Rolex. Not that that was your question, but it's worth pointing out for a couple reasons: (1) It's unlikely Tiffany would call this watch a "Submariner," since that would probably constitute a trademark violation. It's probably the seller calling it that - or if it's a fake, then perhaps the manufacturer put that name on it; either way, it's not a name to be taken seriously, which calls into question the credibility of either the piece or the seller, or both. (2) If Tiffany had a deal with Rolex, whereby they could rebrand their watches, why would they then start contracting to rebrand generic-looking watches that actually detract from the Tiffany image? This is not a high-end watch, and does not seem worthy of the Tiffany name. This leads me to think it could be a fake. Obviously I don't know one way or the other, but when in doubt, it's better to pass.

Keep in mind, whether it is "genuine" or "fake" is somewhat of a dubious distinction anyway, since Tiffany is not a watch manufacturer. Even if this is an authentically rebranded Tiffany, we still don't know who made it, and it doesn't look like a particularly great watch anyway. My honest opinion is, even if this is "genuine," you can do better. If you really want an affordable, well-made automatic, try looking at Victorinox or Hamilton.

you should trying posting this on TRF for the experts there to see. someone over there would give you an answer right away

Yeah, still an ugly aberration piece of junk...and yes that's my opinion.....

_________________
"I became insane, with long intervals of horrible sanity."
2012 GShock 5I Mudman
2012 Breitling Colt 44
2011 Breitling Transocean chrono mercury silver
2011 Rolex Submariner 14060M
2010 Omega Planet Ocean XL
1979 Rolex Date Just two tone

Well the funny thing is, I don't really value your opinion anyway. You have less posts then me and are new to this forum so being a "man" you should show respect for another. Its called manners, something I guess your parents didn't teach you.

I don't really agree with his tone, or his opinion that Tiffany is never suitable for a man, but his general take on the watch in question is pretty much in line with what most people in this thread have been saying. Nobody here has said that's a watch they would consider buying. That should tell you something.

Yes I thought it over and decided to pass on it as well just because its questionable, im looking for a vintage breitling as we speak.