The Breitling Watch Source Forums

Breitling Watch Information Forums, Navitimer, Chronomat
It is currently Sun May 04, 2025 6:43 am

All times are UTC - 8 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 7 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Dead-beat seconds
PostPosted: Tue May 15, 2012 4:56 pm 
Offline
King of Ling
King of Ling

Joined: Sat Jul 16, 2011 3:18 pm
Posts: 1810
Likes: 1 post
Liked in: 0 post
Anyone own one, or seen one of these in person? I have been trying to learn as much as I can about watches and was reading the glossary on this site:

dead-beat seconds: A complication on a mechanical watch where the second hand does not sweep, but jumps forward in one second intervals, much like a quartz watch.

I know a watch should be bought for what you like, granted it's a fairly interesting complication, but....can't get the image of quartz out.

_________________
End of Discussion.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Dead-beat seconds
PostPosted: Wed May 16, 2012 8:18 am 
Offline
Forum Sponsor
Forum Sponsor

Joined: Thu Jun 03, 2010 5:34 am
Posts: 990
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 2 posts
The dead beat seconds is another of those complications that are fairly useless to the owner in this day and age but they have a natural charm and character and are a reflection of the expertise of the watchmaker. Just like tourbillons, minute repeaters, etc.

The most famous of recent times is the Gronefeld One Hertz. Other recent manufacturers have been FP Journe and Audemars Piguet. As you can see, these are high end horological craftmen that are responsible and as a result are tens of thousands of pounds. Although when I heard how much the One Hertz retailed for I thought it was good value!

Incidentally, most mechanical clocks from the 17th to the 19th century had a dead beat seconds due to the use of the deadbeat escapement, which would never work in a wrist watch because it is pendulum driven.

As another aside, an average quartz crystal in a wrist watch runs about 8000Hz. Clearly very little change would need to be made to the IC to distribute movement to the seconds hand at a much higher frequency to make it sweep.

_________________
Forum Representative for Andrew Michaels Jewellers, UK

Please visit my Watch Blog at http://www.AndrewMichaels.co.uk

******Our new Pre-owned watch site www.amjwatches.co.uk is now live*****


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Dead-beat seconds
PostPosted: Wed May 16, 2012 8:53 am 
Offline
Contributing Moderator
Contributing Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 5:09 am
Posts: 36521
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 489 posts
Location: Ontario, Canada
ricardo wrote:
The dead beat seconds is another of those complications that are fairly useless to the owner in this day and age but they have a natural charm and character and are a reflection of the expertise of the watchmaker. Just like tourbillons, minute repeaters, etc.


One of the traditional uses, which I assume still applies is for doctors to get a more accurate heart rate reading than with a sweep seconds.


ricardo wrote:
As another aside, an average quartz crystal in a wrist watch runs about 8000Hz. Clearly very little change would need to be made to the IC to distribute movement to the seconds hand at a much higher frequency to make it sweep.


32,768Hz actually, but who's counting :lol: . The issue with sweeping on a quartz is simply one of significantly shorter battery life with a higher number of movements. Incidentally, Bulova announced a quartz powered watch at Basel that beats at 262,144Hz.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Dead-beat seconds
PostPosted: Wed May 16, 2012 9:24 am 
Offline
Forum Sponsor
Forum Sponsor

Joined: Thu Jun 03, 2010 5:34 am
Posts: 990
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 2 posts
Roffensian wrote:
ricardo wrote:
The dead beat seconds is another of those complications that are fairly useless to the owner in this day and age but they have a natural charm and character and are a reflection of the expertise of the watchmaker. Just like tourbillons, minute repeaters, etc.


One of the traditional uses, which I assume still applies is for doctors to get a more accurate heart rate reading than with a sweep seconds.


ricardo wrote:
As another aside, an average quartz crystal in a wrist watch runs about 8000Hz. Clearly very little change would need to be made to the IC to distribute movement to the seconds hand at a much higher frequency to make it sweep.


32,768Hz actually, but who's counting :lol: . The issue with sweeping on a quartz is simply one of significantly shorter battery life with a higher number of movements. Incidentally, Bulova announced a quartz powered watch at Basel that beats at 262,144Hz.


Where did I get 8KHz from? I remember this particular question coming up in another forum and I could have sworn 8KHz was quoted. I should have done my research before making my reply. :oops: Thanks for the correction Roff.

_________________
Forum Representative for Andrew Michaels Jewellers, UK

Please visit my Watch Blog at http://www.AndrewMichaels.co.uk

******Our new Pre-owned watch site www.amjwatches.co.uk is now live*****


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Dead-beat seconds
PostPosted: Wed May 16, 2012 9:28 am 
Offline
Contributing Moderator
Contributing Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 5:09 am
Posts: 36521
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 489 posts
Location: Ontario, Canada
ricardo wrote:
I remember this particular question coming up in another forum and I could have sworn 8KHz was quoted.



See what happens when you hang out on the wrong side of the internet tracks!!!


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Dead-beat seconds
PostPosted: Wed May 16, 2012 3:55 pm 
Offline
Cult of Breitling Leader
Cult of Breitling Leader
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2010 7:34 pm
Posts: 3405
Likes: 27 posts
Liked in: 9 posts
Location: Portland, Oregon, USA
On a three-hand watch, one of the things I like best is the sweep of the second hand. It looks much nicer to me than the once-per-second tick of a quartz second hand. For that reason, I don't think I would like a dead-beat seconds mechanical.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Dead-beat seconds
PostPosted: Thu May 17, 2012 3:14 am 
Offline
King of Ling
King of Ling

Joined: Sat Jul 16, 2011 3:18 pm
Posts: 1810
Likes: 1 post
Liked in: 0 post
JacksonStone wrote:
On a three-hand watch, one of the things I like best is the sweep of the second hand. It looks much nicer to me than the once-per-second tick of a quartz second hand. For that reason, I don't think I would like a dead-beat seconds mechanical.


I agree. I do think though if you could switch between the tick and sweep, that would be a pretty cool feature.

_________________
End of Discussion.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 7 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 8 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
 




Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group