The Breitling Watch Source Forums

Breitling Watch Information Forums, Navitimer, Chronomat
It is currently Mon May 05, 2025 8:32 am

All times are UTC - 8 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 7 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Nov 16, 2011 8:36 pm 
Offline
Breitling Maniac
Breitling Maniac

Joined: Sun Nov 13, 2011 3:54 pm
Posts: 1499
Likes: 8 posts
Liked in: 11 posts
Location: Australia
Hi, just doing some research on 806's and saw some interesting threads here about them though still a long way to go in learning about them. Can I see some pictures of your 806's from 54 and 55 please.

Thanks


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Nov 17, 2011 7:15 am 
Offline
Breitling Fanatic
Breitling Fanatic

Joined: Sun Jan 16, 2011 12:46 am
Posts: 198
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 5 posts
Have you looked here?
http://www.lesmala.net/jean-michel/navitimer/

_________________
Breitling Navitimer: Black Dial
OMEGA Speedmaster Professional
Steinhart Nav.B-Chrono II
Elgin-Hamilton 37500 (Aircraft Clock)


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Nov 17, 2011 10:24 am 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member

Joined: Fri Oct 09, 2009 8:58 am
Posts: 3171
Likes: 294 posts
Liked in: 534 posts
Location: Santa Marta colombia on our way to french polynesia
Kurt's website
http://www.watchlife.com/DesktopDefault.aspx?tabid=144

but technically there are no '54 806's :) Those navitimers should all have the V72 movement and no reference
only towards the end of '55 there are some 806's

_________________
"I spent most of my money on Booze, Breitling and Boats. The rest I wasted" - mostly Elmore Leonard


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Nov 17, 2011 3:57 pm 
Offline
Breitling Maniac
Breitling Maniac

Joined: Sun Nov 13, 2011 3:54 pm
Posts: 1499
Likes: 8 posts
Liked in: 11 posts
Location: Australia
Thanks for the info mjfur, Dracha.

@Dracha: Yupz, that's true too, so the caseback would have no reference number written on it, will look something like this, right? What about a serial number somewhere? http://www.swisswatchexpo.com/ProductGa ... wNumber=10. But then again from what I read they were not even called Navitimers when the 54 valjoux 72 version was out and only got that name in 55 true?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Nov 17, 2011 5:06 pm 
Offline
Contributing Moderator
Contributing Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 5:09 am
Posts: 36521
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 489 posts
Location: Ontario, Canada
There are lots of threads here on 'early' Navitimers and whether there are any prior to 54. You have to assume that if they didn't exist until 54 then they wouldn't have a name until at least then. Regardless of when you think they first appeared I have a hard time believing that they didn't have a name, and Breitling still maintains that they were referred to as Navitimers as early as 1952 - but then they also maintain that there are 1952 Navitimers.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Nov 17, 2011 6:34 pm 
Offline
Breitling Maniac
Breitling Maniac

Joined: Sun Nov 13, 2011 3:54 pm
Posts: 1499
Likes: 8 posts
Liked in: 11 posts
Location: Australia
Roffensian wrote:
There are lots of threads here on 'early' Navitimers and whether there are any prior to 54. You have to assume that if they didn't exist until 54 then they wouldn't have a name until at least then. Regardless of when you think they first appeared I have a hard time believing that they didn't have a name, and Breitling still maintains that they were referred to as Navitimers as early as 1952 - but then they also maintain that there are 1952 Navitimers.



Thanks. Wouldn't that information about first registration dates on the "Navitimer" trademark be in the trademarks registration records with the govt though is possible they might have used the name prior to registering it?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Nov 18, 2011 5:00 am 
Offline
Contributing Moderator
Contributing Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 5:09 am
Posts: 36521
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 489 posts
Location: Ontario, Canada
cruvon wrote:
Roffensian wrote:
There are lots of threads here on 'early' Navitimers and whether there are any prior to 54. You have to assume that if they didn't exist until 54 then they wouldn't have a name until at least then. Regardless of when you think they first appeared I have a hard time believing that they didn't have a name, and Breitling still maintains that they were referred to as Navitimers as early as 1952 - but then they also maintain that there are 1952 Navitimers.



Thanks. Wouldn't that information about first registration dates on the "Navitimer" trademark be in the trademarks registration records with the govt though is possible they might have used the name prior to registering it?



The name wasn't registered until later - 1955 or 56 from memory.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 7 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 8 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
 




Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group