The Breitling Watch Source Forums

Breitling Watch Information Forums, Navitimer, Chronomat
It is currently Wed May 14, 2025 4:52 am

All times are UTC - 8 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 28 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Jun 29, 2011 7:08 am 
Offline
Breitling Fanatic
Breitling Fanatic

Joined: Tue Sep 21, 2010 9:39 am
Posts: 108
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 0 post
Location: London
My AD has just sent me details of a new limited edition Breitling. I was already unsure about the Superocean GMT but with a green rubber-molded bezel.
Limited edition of 1,000 and around £3,100.
What does anyone think?


You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Jun 29, 2011 7:18 am 
Offline
All Roads lead to Breitling
All Roads lead to Breitling
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 09, 2010 6:01 pm
Posts: 8010
Likes: 3 posts
Liked in: 33 posts
l would like to see what this watch would look like had Breitling actually designed a case for it, instead of reusing the unsellable Colt GMT case. I am not a fan of the integrated bracelet, even on rubber. This could have been an amazing watch. As it is, it looks prety cool if I crop off the lugs and bracelet.

_________________
SHARKMAN


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Jun 29, 2011 7:25 am 
Offline
King of Ling
King of Ling
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 19, 2010 1:51 am
Posts: 1924
Likes: 3 posts
Liked in: 13 posts
Location: Virginia Beach
sharkman wrote:
l would like to see what this watch would look like had Breitling actually designed a case for it, instead of reusing the unsellable Colt GMT case. I am not a fan of the integrated bracelet, even on rubber. This could have been an amazing watch. As it is, it looks prety cool if I crop off the lugs and bracelet.


Yeah to all of the above. I'd that bezel green rubber? If so that's horrible. A green ceramic bezel might make it nicer but those lugs just don't do it for me.

Sent from my Droid using Tapatalk

_________________
"Leave the gun, take the cannoli."


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Jun 29, 2011 7:35 am 
Offline
Breitling Fanatic
Breitling Fanatic

Joined: Tue Sep 21, 2010 9:39 am
Posts: 108
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 0 post
Location: London
AD says it is rubber molded just as Superocean 42 with steel edges on bezel


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Jun 29, 2011 7:36 am 
Offline
Contributing Moderator
Contributing Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 5:09 am
Posts: 36521
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 489 posts
Location: Ontario, Canada
Conceptually I prefer this to some of the recent designs, but agree that the rubber is still an issue for me - sapphire covered bezel, ceramic, heck SOH style and this would have some good potential.

In terms of the lugs :yeahthat , just looking at the thumbnail those lugs dominate the whole watch.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Jun 29, 2011 8:28 am 
Offline
Contributing Moderator
Contributing Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 24, 2007 11:39 am
Posts: 12837
Likes: 148 posts
Liked in: 520 posts
Location: UK
No thanks.

I don't like the red second hand and writing with the green - horrible colour clash. Plus I hate rubber bezels at the best of times, but a GREEN rubber bezel?? Errrr... no thanks.

_________________
Driver8

Site Moderator
Image


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Jun 29, 2011 4:07 pm 
Offline
King of Ling
King of Ling
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 29, 2008 11:14 pm
Posts: 1938
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 0 post
Location: Australia
Looks like a mess to me.

As D8 said, the red doesn't go well with the green, and I think the bezel number font clashes horribly with the dial number font. I don't like the integrated bracelet, and although I don't hate rubber bezels, I can't imagine a green one is going to look good in person.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Jun 29, 2011 4:42 pm 
Offline
King of Ling
King of Ling
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 25, 2010 2:30 pm
Posts: 1511
Likes: 126 posts
Liked in: 77 posts
Location: Minnesota, USA
sharkman wrote:
l would like to see what this watch would look like had Breitling actually designed a case for it, instead of reusing the unsellable Colt GMT case. I am not a fan of the integrated bracelet, even on rubber.

:yeahthat Don't mind the rubber bezel and the green looks OK to me.

_________________
Chrono Jetstream
Montbrilliant 1903
Aerospace E79362


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Jun 29, 2011 6:06 pm 
Offline
Breitling Enthusiast
Breitling Enthusiast

Joined: Sun Jun 12, 2011 3:39 am
Posts: 15
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 0 post
Now slap a ceramic bezel on that watch and it might look pretty good. I really like the Rolex GMT II Master with the ceramic bezel.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Jun 29, 2011 6:10 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 09, 2010 10:34 am
Posts: 965
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 0 post
Location: Newtown, PA
Driver8 wrote:
No thanks.

I don't like the red second hand and writing with the green - horrible colour clash


With this watch it's Christmas all year round! Perfect for Santa and no one else.

_________________
“The only reason for time is so that everything doesn't happen at once.” - Albert Einstein


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Jun 29, 2011 6:55 pm 
Offline
Breitling Maniac
Breitling Maniac
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 06, 2010 6:49 pm
Posts: 1340
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 0 post
Location: Texas
Roffensian wrote:
but agree that the rubber is still an issue for me - sapphire covered bezel, ceramic, heck SOH style


Out of curiosity....which material, sapphire or ceramic, is considered more durable, scratch resistant , etc.? I have had my eye on an Aquatimer 2000 for some time, but the Sub-C gets all the love.

Secondly....when considering the Aquatimer and something like this offering, both of which I am guessing are similarly priced, I just feel like I am getting more in the IWC. Just my two cents


Last edited by thomasenlow1 on Wed Jun 29, 2011 7:10 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Jun 29, 2011 7:07 pm 
Offline
Cult of Breitling Leader
Cult of Breitling Leader
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2010 7:34 pm
Posts: 3405
Likes: 27 posts
Liked in: 9 posts
Location: Portland, Oregon, USA
If Breitling hadn't already jumped the shark, they certainly would have with this model. Seriously, Breitling, pull your heads out of your asses and come up with some designs I can get excited about. At this point, I really am no longer a fan of the brand. I love some of their older stuff, but I can honestly say I couldn't give two sh*ts about the brand as it currently exists.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Jun 29, 2011 7:55 pm 
Offline
Breitling Fanatic
Breitling Fanatic

Joined: Wed May 26, 2010 2:21 pm
Posts: 297
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 0 post
Location: MD
Make that bezel orange and I'm in.

_________________
Steelfish GMT LE (white)


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Jun 29, 2011 7:59 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 14, 2010 6:37 am
Posts: 3785
Likes: 1 post
Liked in: 20 posts
Location: USA
thomasenlow1 wrote:
Out of curiosity....which material, sapphire or ceramic, is considered more durable, scratch resistant , etc.? I have had my eye on an Aquatimer 2000 for some time, but the Sub-C gets all the love.

Secondly....when considering the Aquatimer and something like this offering, both of which I am guessing are similarly priced, I just feel like I am getting more in the IWC. Just my two cents



That's a really good quesetion...I'd like to know that awesome as well. I'm gonna say that Ceramic is more scratch resistant than sapphire.

I agree that the IWC is much more watch for the money than this not-so incredible hulk disaster.

_________________
"I don't own any watches, I just lease them"


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Jun 29, 2011 8:02 pm 
Offline
Cult of Breitling Leader
Cult of Breitling Leader
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2010 7:34 pm
Posts: 3405
Likes: 27 posts
Liked in: 9 posts
Location: Portland, Oregon, USA
mfserge wrote:
That's a really good quesetion...I'd like to know that awesome as well. I'm gonna say that Ceramic is more scratch resistant than sapphire.

I don't know either way, although I'll note how many times it's been said that sapphire is second in hardness only to diamond.

mfserge wrote:
I agree that the IWC is much more watch for the money than this not-so incredible hulk disaster.

The current Aquatimer is a sweet watch. It's a little bulky for my taste, but if it had the same dimensions as an Omega SMP or PO, I'd be all over it.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 28 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC - 8 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 27 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
 




Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group