kosm1o wrote:
You asked for opinions about the Rolex Submariner. I gave mine so there you have it.
I'm not disputing the fact that you
have an opinion. I'm arguing that the basis you gave for your opinion is inconsistent.
I elaborated on this here:
I wrote:
You doubt Breitling based on your sole experience, yet claim statistics (and I use that term loosely) when evaluating the Rolex Submariner. This is an obvious evidentiary bias.
What's your basis for skepticism, as you claim ignorance in the same paragraph?
Any piece of equipment used in a hostile environment should be inspected prior to use. You're asking for something here that doesn't exist.
Are you going to respond to any of that?