The Breitling Watch Source Forums

Breitling Watch Information Forums, Navitimer, Chronomat
It is currently Sun May 04, 2025 4:09 am

All times are UTC - 8 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 15 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Dec 24, 2007 12:53 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2007 10:24 am
Posts: 2681
Likes: 3 posts
Liked in: 71 posts
Location: Dhahran KSA
I don't get it, the SA and Chrono Avenger seem to be very similar watches in that they have the same features, movement, water rating etc etc except that the SA is rather larger and cheaper by about a 1000USD. Anybody else find this puzzling?

I still like the Evo alot better, it's styling is nicer and that beutifull rounded side just puts a smile to my face, but why is it more expensive? Maybe that's why the SA is being discountinued, to be renamed and the price jacked up. From what I see it seems that metal behemoth is selling well so Breitling might have realised they under valued it.

_________________
Certified watch nut.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Dec 24, 2007 2:41 pm 
Offline
Breitling Fanatic
Breitling Fanatic

Joined: Sat Sep 22, 2007 4:15 am
Posts: 112
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 0 post
Location: Jacksonville,FL
Altair...

The two watches are similiar, but the SA is about $500 U.S more than the CA. I have not heard that the SA is being discountinued, I know the CA is, and not in the 08 Chronolog.

The SA is big, and since I have been wearing mine for the past week, gets noticed all the time...nothing but compliments. My CA gets noticed too,but not like the other.
By the way, the EVO is sweet too, and next on my list...

Merry Christmas to all!

Jim

_________________
Breitling Super Avenger,White
Breitling Chrono Avenger,Black


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Dec 24, 2007 4:59 pm 
Offline
Breitling Enthusiast
Breitling Enthusiast

Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2007 5:48 pm
Posts: 50
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 0 post
Location: NYC
Remember, the SA is in SS and the CA is in Titanium, which making it a lot more expensive to produce. However, Ti = Non corrosive, super light weight, scratch resistance.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Dec 24, 2007 10:59 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2007 10:24 am
Posts: 2681
Likes: 3 posts
Liked in: 71 posts
Location: Dhahran KSA
Sorry guys!! I meant to say the SA and Chronomat Evolution in my first post!!! Those are the two similar watches I meant, and the Evo is 1000 USD more.....discuss.

_________________
Certified watch nut.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Dec 25, 2007 5:48 am 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 21, 2007 11:05 am
Posts: 12682
Likes: 186 posts
Liked in: 72 posts
Location: Zagreb, Croatia
Evo costs more because of a bracelet, nicer dial, screwdown pushers, slightly convexed sapphire crystal and finer overall finish, IMHO.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Dec 25, 2007 6:25 am 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2007 10:24 am
Posts: 2681
Likes: 3 posts
Liked in: 71 posts
Location: Dhahran KSA
I have not handled the SA personaly so that might be it bnewbie. If the rumors regarding the discountinuation of the SA turn out to betrue they might come out with a better finished SA alternative, a Breitling non-Bentley Bentley if you will.

_________________
Certified watch nut.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Dec 25, 2007 8:03 am 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 21, 2007 11:05 am
Posts: 12682
Likes: 186 posts
Liked in: 72 posts
Location: Zagreb, Croatia
I don't think it'll be discontinued because it's one of the best selling models.
Maybe a slight makeover but nothing radical, cos' it's in the aeromarine series and supposed to be cheaper than the Evo which is in the windrider series.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Dec 25, 2007 9:29 am 
Offline
Site Admin
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2007 3:40 pm
Posts: 3320
Likes: 120 posts
Liked in: 18 posts
Location: canada
Aside from the size, the SA is less spectacular than the EVO. If the EVO came in a 48mm version, it would blow the SA out of the water. The Dial on the SA is bland, the details on the pushers are not as impressive, the bezel isn't as nice with all the screwdown riders... and the shape of the case is a bit less nice. Still a nice watch, but the EVO is 'finer' looking.

_________________
BreitlingSource Admin
http://www.breitlingsource.com - http://blog.breitlingsource.com


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Dec 25, 2007 1:56 pm 
Offline
Contributing Moderator
Contributing Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 24, 2007 11:39 am
Posts: 12837
Likes: 148 posts
Liked in: 520 posts
Location: UK
breitlingsource wrote:
Aside from the size, the SA is less spectacular than the EVO. If the EVO came in a 48mm version, it would blow the SA out of the water. The Dial on the SA is bland, the details on the pushers are not as impressive, the bezel isn't as nice with all the screwdown riders... and the shape of the case is a bit less nice. Still a nice watch, but the EVO is 'finer' looking.

I kind ofagree with Admin on this one, but I think it really depends on what you find spectacular in a watch. Yes the SA's dial is more plain (personally I'd call it that, rather than "bland"), but IMHO I think that if you want a manly, functional looking watch, then the SA IS a truly spectacular piece. I think the pushpieces and the bezel suit the SA perfectly, and I don't find them any better or worse than those on any of the Evo's I've handled. I love the Evo too, and definitely want to get one myself, but I think it can be slightly more dressy in comparison to the SA, so in terms of styling I think they aren't really a like-for-like.

I love them both, for different reasons, but there can be no denying that the SA is excellent value for money.

_________________
Driver8

Site Moderator
Image


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 26, 2007 7:05 am 
Offline
Breitling Connoisseur
Breitling Connoisseur

Joined: Wed Apr 18, 2007 11:37 am
Posts: 754
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 0 post
I agree with Admin,

I'm hoping that they come out with a larger EVO. I really like the gold and steel model with the roman numerals but when I put one on it's just too small after wearing a Bentley for 8 months and now the SA. I'd be happy if they made a gold and steel 2 tone SA.

_________________
LING MAN

:fulllingclub:


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 26, 2007 8:57 pm 
Offline
Breitling Fanatic
Breitling Fanatic
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 26, 2007 11:09 pm
Posts: 224
Likes: 2 posts
Liked in: 0 post
Location: Boston
If you hold them side by side you can easily see why the evo is more expensive. The pilot bracelet alone is list $1100 vs. $420 for the professional (SA) bracelet. There is a lot more detail in the dial and subdials of the evo, which, if you like it or not, can't be denied. The greater detail means more man hours to produce. Lastly, and often overlooked, is the case itself. The evo has the windrider case which is sleaker and more rounded. This means more time is spent stamping, forming and polishing it to it's final shape. The SA has the more boxy case that defines the Aeromarine series, and less costly to produce. Look at the pricing of the Windriders vs. the Aeromarines as a whole, Windriders are more expensive across the board (for the most part).

The only thing in common is the movement, everything else is quite different. I have a Chrono SuperOcean and an Evo, they look very similar, but are also quite different when you get down to the details.

_________________
Breitling Navitimer 01 46mm
Breitling Chrono Avenger :lingsrock:
Breitling Chronomat Evolution
Breitling Chrono SuperOcean
Breitling Avenger Seawolf
Omega Seamaster Pro James Bond LE Co-Axial Auto


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Dec 27, 2007 1:42 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member

Joined: Thu Sep 27, 2007 11:48 pm
Posts: 3806
Likes: 11 posts
Liked in: 19 posts
Location: Sweden
naznax wrote:
Remember, the SA is in SS and the CA is in Titanium, which making it a lot more expensive to produce. However, Ti = Non corrosive, super light weight, scratch resistance.


Titanium is surely non corrosive and super light, but not scratch resistant. Ti is softer and more flexible than SS, but then also easier to get scratches to.

_________________
Collection: http://s540.photobucket.com/albums/gg32 ... mview=grid


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Dec 28, 2007 8:32 am 
Offline
King of Ling
King of Ling
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 29, 2007 12:48 pm
Posts: 2092
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 2 posts
Location: Fort Smith, AR USA
I have seen the Super Avenger priced below the Chrono Avenger too. Both in my opinion are great looking pieces. I think the size of the Super Avenger just makes a statement. I prefer Chronograph dials, but I love the look of the Super Avenger. If the Chrono Avenger was the same size, I would buy one tomorrow, and beg the wife for forgiveness.

~Brian

_________________
Breitling Super Avenger
Fortis Flieger Chronograph
Rolex Submariner Date
Image


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Dec 28, 2007 10:52 am 
Offline
Site Admin
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2007 3:40 pm
Posts: 3320
Likes: 120 posts
Liked in: 18 posts
Location: canada
Im confused, I thought we were discussing the Evo and SA.. but now I realize we were talking about SA and CA. I thought they were priced really close?

_________________
BreitlingSource Admin
http://www.breitlingsource.com - http://blog.breitlingsource.com


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Dec 30, 2007 7:47 pm 
Offline
Breitling Fanatic
Breitling Fanatic
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 26, 2007 11:09 pm
Posts: 224
Likes: 2 posts
Liked in: 0 post
Location: Boston
Quote:
Titanium is surely non corrosive and super light, but not scratch resistant. Ti is softer and more flexible than SS, but then also easier to get scratches to


I have an Avenger Seawolf and I can assure everyone here that Titanium is not scratch resistance. Mine has a big gash on the bezel, I don't mind it though, it gives it some character. I love the watch, wish the chrono came in yellow.

_________________
Breitling Navitimer 01 46mm
Breitling Chrono Avenger :lingsrock:
Breitling Chronomat Evolution
Breitling Chrono SuperOcean
Breitling Avenger Seawolf
Omega Seamaster Pro James Bond LE Co-Axial Auto


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 15 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 8 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 30 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
 




Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group