The Breitling Watch Source Forums

Breitling Watch Information Forums, Navitimer, Chronomat
It is currently Thu May 08, 2025 10:45 am

All times are UTC - 8 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 21 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Dec 11, 2012 1:54 pm 
Offline
King of Ling
King of Ling

Joined: Tue Feb 28, 2012 7:04 am
Posts: 1877
Likes: 5 posts
Liked in: 408 posts
Location: Philly/NYC
This Datora looks fake to me based on the slide rule hashes (too much distance to dial) and strap says "cuir" instead of croco. Seller is a 4600+ 100% feedback seller.

Image

Image

http://www.ebay.com/itm/BREITLING-MONTB ... 2a26fb14aa


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Dec 11, 2012 2:00 pm 
Offline
Breitling Connoisseur
Breitling Connoisseur
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2012 9:48 am
Posts: 534
Likes: 1 post
Liked in: 2 posts
I think it is real Datora.

_________________
Breitling B-1
Breitling Aerospace
Breitling Navitimer Montbrillant
Breitling Navitimer LE 125 Anniversaire
Omega Seamaster PO Chrono XL
Citizen Blue Angels
Rolex Submariner LV


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Dec 11, 2012 2:16 pm 
Offline
Wild Ling, You Make my Heart Sing!
Wild Ling, You Make my Heart Sing!

Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2010 10:20 am
Posts: 4495
Likes: 18 posts
Liked in: 33 posts
Location: Yorkshire, UK
This is an odd one. The strap and outer sliderule scale are fake, but dial looks okay. (From memory, the gap between the 25-26-27 dates is wrong on the fake but this one looks okay). Maybe its a fake/real franken.


Edit: Here is the quality fake. I doubt there is a new improved version of the fake as its now a discontinued model:

download/file.php?id=15609&mode=view

_________________
Breitling (Navitimer A23322, Aerospace, Chronomat Blackbird, Chronomat A13352 +UTC)
Jaeger-LeCoultre Reverso Gran Sport, Zenith Elite 670
Marathon (SAR, JSAR), Ollech & Wajs Cobra


Last edited by ade113 on Tue Dec 11, 2012 2:25 pm, edited 2 times in total.

Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Dec 11, 2012 2:22 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member

Joined: Sun Jan 02, 2011 4:36 pm
Posts: 14216
Likes: 1471 posts
Liked in: 1728 posts
Location: Vienna, Austria
hmmmmm. sliderule gaps are huge, but caseback looks correct. my bet isthat the watch is fake, worryingly good in some aspects, strap defintely is fake.

edit: Adrain seems to have similar doubts. need Roff and bnewbie.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Dec 11, 2012 2:24 pm 
Offline
King of Ling
King of Ling

Joined: Tue Feb 28, 2012 7:04 am
Posts: 1877
Likes: 5 posts
Liked in: 408 posts
Location: Philly/NYC
Yea, I wasn't sure about this one at all. That slide rule and strap were the only things I could see that were definitely off.

Sent from my XT907 using Tapatalk 2


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Dec 11, 2012 4:08 pm 
Offline
Contributing Moderator
Contributing Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 5:09 am
Posts: 36521
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 489 posts
Location: Ontario, Canada
I don't think that it's an outright fake. The outer sliderule is definitely wrong as noted, but I'm surethat the caseback and dial are real, the handset looks correct and so does the bezel. I suspect that it's a real piece that may have had an unauthorised service.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Dec 11, 2012 4:49 pm 
Offline
King of Ling
King of Ling

Joined: Tue Feb 28, 2012 7:04 am
Posts: 1877
Likes: 5 posts
Liked in: 408 posts
Location: Philly/NYC
Roffensian wrote:
I don't think that it's an outright fake. The outer sliderule is definitely wrong as noted, but I'm surethat the caseback and dial are real, the handset looks correct and so does the bezel. I suspect that it's a real piece that may have had an unauthorised service.


So what's the normal policy for something like this? Let it go or report it or what?

Sent from my XT907 using Tapatalk 2


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Dec 11, 2012 5:05 pm 
Offline
Contributing Moderator
Contributing Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 5:09 am
Posts: 36521
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 489 posts
Location: Ontario, Canada
natesen wrote:
Roffensian wrote:
I don't think that it's an outright fake. The outer sliderule is definitely wrong as noted, but I'm surethat the caseback and dial are real, the handset looks correct and so does the bezel. I suspect that it's a real piece that may have had an unauthorised service.


So what's the normal policy for something like this? Let it go or report it or what?

Sent from my XT907 using Tapatalk 2



Wait for other people to offer opinions!

As of right now what exactly would you report it for? The strap is a bit dubious, but seller doesn't claim that it's OEM Breitling.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Dec 11, 2012 5:26 pm 
Offline
King of Ling
King of Ling

Joined: Tue Feb 28, 2012 7:04 am
Posts: 1877
Likes: 5 posts
Liked in: 408 posts
Location: Philly/NYC
Roffensian wrote:
natesen wrote:
Roffensian wrote:
I don't think that it's an outright fake. The outer sliderule is definitely wrong as noted, but I'm surethat the caseback and dial are real, the handset looks correct and so does the bezel. I suspect that it's a real piece that may have had an unauthorised service.


So what's the normal policy for something like this? Let it go or report it or what?

Sent from my XT907 using Tapatalk 2



Wait for other people to offer opinions!

As of right now what exactly would you report it for? The strap is a bit dubious, but seller doesn't claim that it's OEM Breitling.


Yeah, its just an odd instance it seems. I wouldn't be happy with that slide rule or strap but the main watch itself seems real. Hopefully whoever ends up with it realizes the inconsistencies.

Sent from my XT907 using Tapatalk 2


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Dec 11, 2012 6:01 pm 
Offline
Breitling Connoisseur
Breitling Connoisseur
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2012 3:44 am
Posts: 682
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 1 post
This is what I got... I imagine most are explained through model variation but these were thing things that struck me as the most off...

Image Image

-The chronographs do not appear to be recessed on the one in question
-The red appears weaker although it may be the photo
-PINK--The notches on the slide rule look sharper on the one in question
-DARK GREEN--The triangle next to the 35 is wider on the one in question, and narrower on the comparison. The three triangles next to it show that it is not a camera angle as they are all the same side
-RED--The second hand notches are not as distinct on the presumably real one
-DARK BLUE--The 0 is more circular on the real and more boxed on the one in question—this applies to the outside numbering only
-BRIGHT BLUE--Notice the “O” in “NOV” is not the same
-ORANGE--The red triangle over NAUT is almost touching the U on the one in question, but is further away on the other picture
-ASPARAGUS--The 1/3 second marking lines are longer on the one not in question
-DARK RED--The letter spacing on OMETRE is different
-BRIGHT GREEN--On the inner 80 and 90, you can not see a space between the two characters on the one in question


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Dec 12, 2012 2:09 am 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 21, 2007 11:05 am
Posts: 12682
Likes: 186 posts
Liked in: 72 posts
Location: Zagreb, Croatia
I don't have any doubts (note the too light 100th of an hour scale, also) so I'll report it.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Dec 12, 2012 3:22 am 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member

Joined: Sun Jan 02, 2011 4:36 pm
Posts: 14216
Likes: 1471 posts
Liked in: 1728 posts
Location: Vienna, Austria
excellent spotting; worryingly good fake. this adds another model to the "never without complete sets of papers" group.
reported +1


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Dec 12, 2012 4:02 am 
Offline
Breitling Connoisseur
Breitling Connoisseur
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2012 3:44 am
Posts: 682
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 1 post
+2

So does this mean that for this model, an AD stamped and printed booklet is really the only way to be positive?

What are the odds eBay actually removes this?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Dec 12, 2012 4:21 am 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 21, 2007 11:05 am
Posts: 12682
Likes: 186 posts
Liked in: 72 posts
Location: Zagreb, Croatia
nickzac wrote:
So does this mean that for this model, an AD stamped and printed booklet is really the only way to be positive?

For someone with less experience with "quality" fakes, yes.

nickzac wrote:
What are the odds eBay actually removes this?

We'll see, sometimes they do, sometimes they don't.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Dec 12, 2012 4:37 am 
Offline
Breitling Connoisseur
Breitling Connoisseur
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2012 3:44 am
Posts: 682
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 1 post
bnewbie wrote:
nickzac wrote:
So does this mean that for this model, an AD stamped and printed booklet is really the only way to be positive?

For someone with less experience with "quality" fakes, yes.


That's scary; and frustrating :( Do you think there is a good chance the movement matches the outside's trend of being so similar?


...I hope Breitling hurries up with their electronic ID system


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 21 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC - 8 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 19 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
 




Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group