+3
M
| The Breitling Watch Source Forums https://www.breitlingsource.com/phpBB2/ |
|
| Breitling Chronomat Evolution https://www.breitlingsource.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?f=9&t=33305 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | icamwatch [ Thu Sep 08, 2011 9:29 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Breitling Chronomat Evolution |
http://www.ebay.com/itm/ws/eBayISAPI.dl ... 500wt_1202 |
|
| Author: | Sharkmouth [ Fri Sep 09, 2011 1:41 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Breitling Chronomat Evolution |
Hope you've not just bought this! "High quality replica identified by incorrect length of minute mark at 1 (should be short like at 59)" Sold for $1500. Reported post sale. |
|
| Author: | Roffensian [ Fri Sep 09, 2011 4:30 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Breitling Chronomat Evolution |
+1 - "'Quality' fake, but errors in tick marks, specifically length of mark at 1 is wrong (too long)." |
|
| Author: | WatchFred [ Fri Sep 09, 2011 5:06 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Breitling Chronomat Evolution |
+2 |
|
| Author: | goonermike [ Fri Sep 09, 2011 11:52 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Breitling Chronomat Evolution |
+3 M
|
|
| Author: | icamwatch [ Fri Sep 09, 2011 12:19 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Breitling Chronomat Evolution |
Interesting, should the markings all be the same length? |
|
| Author: | ade113 [ Fri Sep 09, 2011 1:58 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Breitling Chronomat Evolution |
icamwatch wrote: Interesting, should the markings all be the same length? Yeap, banton dial Evos like this should have short sec marks at the cardinals (ie. 1, 14,16,,29,31,44,46,59). This one is typical of fakes in that they are not only the wrong, they are not even a consistent length. Reported post-sale. |
|
| Author: | sharkman [ Fri Sep 09, 2011 2:20 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Breitling Chronomat Evolution |
Second one today |
|
| Author: | nr123 [ Fri Sep 09, 2011 8:16 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Breitling Chronomat Evolution |
Obviously the person making this replica should not have done that - if they made the markers the same length would you have passed this off as real? |
|
| Author: | sharkman [ Fri Sep 09, 2011 8:36 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Breitling Chronomat Evolution |
nr123 wrote: Obviously the person making this replica should not have done that - if they made the markers the same length would you have passed this off as real? I wouldn't pass anything as real on that pic. There is enough to rule it out and call "fake." Date font is almost never right on fakes, even the better ones. The Evo and Steelfish they put out are scary. Sharkmouth maintains the definitive replica ID site and Admin has video primers/reviews of the better Evo and Steelfish on here (or maybe just the youtube channel). |
|
| Author: | br549 [ Sat Sep 10, 2011 4:37 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Breitling Chronomat Evolution |
Reported post sale. |
|
| Author: | WatchFred [ Sat Sep 10, 2011 6:07 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Breitling Chronomat Evolution |
post sale +1 |
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC - 8 hours |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |
|