| The Breitling Watch Source Forums https://www.breitlingsource.com/phpBB2/ |
|
| FIGHTER good or bad https://www.breitlingsource.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?f=9&t=32999 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | mazieresmick [ Sun Aug 28, 2011 1:26 am ] |
| Post subject: | FIGHTER good or bad |
Hey Guys, Checked out Sharkmouth fake  web site on the Fighters and think my new purchase is pukka .Would love a second opinion. EBay item no 190563677665 Tried to paste the link, but not to sure what I am doing, http://www.ebay.com/itm/190563677665?ru ... 3D1&_rdc=1 Cheers |
|
| Author: | ade113 [ Sun Aug 28, 2011 2:59 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: FIGHTER good or bad |
Yes its the real one but I'm not sure if the pic is a copied stock photo. |
|
| Author: | Roffensian [ Sun Aug 28, 2011 4:54 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: FIGHTER good or bad |
ade113 wrote: Yes its the real one but I'm not sure if the pic is a copied stock photo.  Definitely a real watch in the photo, but looks like a stock photo rather than one by the seller. |
|
| Author: | mazieresmick [ Sun Aug 28, 2011 7:55 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: FIGHTER good or bad |
Roffensian wrote: ade113 wrote: Yes its the real one but I'm not sure if the pic is a copied stock photo. Definitely a real watch in the photo, but looks like a stock photo rather than one by the seller. I know what you are saying and I thought the same, but if it was from a stock photo and the watch is not the same as the photo, then it goes back to Japan and I claim my money back from Paypal. I can see smear marks on the glass and scratches on the back, so I thought this must be genuine and not a standard new watch photo. Am i being really naive |
|
| Author: | Roffensian [ Sun Aug 28, 2011 8:27 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: FIGHTER good or bad |
mazieresmick wrote: Roffensian wrote: ade113 wrote: Yes its the real one but I'm not sure if the pic is a copied stock photo. Definitely a real watch in the photo, but looks like a stock photo rather than one by the seller. I know what you are saying and I thought the same, but if it was from a stock photo and the watch is not the same as the photo, then it goes back to Japan and I claim my money back from Paypal. I can see smear marks on the glass and scratches on the back, so I thought this must be genuine and not a standard new watch photo. Am i being really naive Some of them are definitely 'real world' shots (of a real one), but some look stock, which makes me wonder why. May be nothing odd at all, I just prefer that all photos are clearly of the watch for sale. |
|
| Author: | Sharkmouth [ Mon Aug 29, 2011 1:44 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: FIGHTER good or bad |
Just make sure what you receive is the watch shown in the pics and you're fine. |
|
| Author: | mazieresmick [ Mon Aug 29, 2011 2:12 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: FIGHTER good or bad |
Sharkmouth wrote: Just make sure what you receive is the watch shown in the pics and you're fine. You are reading one happy blokes Email. The watch is exactly the same as the photos, looks even better in the flesh, also checked with head office serial no etc.Although I got the watch for about £1k under dealer prices, had to pay €450 to the French goverment for VAT etc, money grabbing gits Such a happy little soldier. Thanks for all the input guys, this site is brilliant, keep finding them fakes, Mazieresmick |
|
| Author: | Sharkmouth [ Tue Aug 30, 2011 1:32 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: FIGHTER good or bad |
Congratulations!
|
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC - 8 hours |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |
|