| The Breitling Watch Source Forums https://www.breitlingsource.com/phpBB2/ |
|
| Is this really a Chronomat? https://www.breitlingsource.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?f=9&t=31993 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | Rennywuk [ Wed Jul 20, 2011 12:13 am ] |
| Post subject: | Is this really a Chronomat? |
This may be the wrong place to post this as I know the watch is genuine. The seller listed this as a chronomat but I don't think it is. My assumption is a chronomat is short for chronomatic which is an automatic chronograph and a chronograph is a watch with "stop watch" function - I would be grateful if someone could confirm this.  Many thanks http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=220812867274&ssPageName=STRK:MEWAX:IT |
|
| Author: | Sharkmouth [ Wed Jul 20, 2011 1:46 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Is this really a Chronomat? |
You're correct in thinking this is not a Chronomat. The seller is wrong. Hopefully, this will explain the terms. Chronomat (like Antares) is a model name used by Breitling. It has been used for lots of different watches since the 1940s which were originally all manual wind. Chrono-matic is also a Breitling model name for a different watch to the Chronomat. The name was first used in 1969 for the first automatic Chronomat. Chronograph is a generic term for a watch with a stopwatch function. They can be manual, automatic or quartz. And for completeness, chronometer is a generic term for a watch which has been tested to specific accuracy. All Breitling watches since around 2000 are tested by COSC - Contrôle Officiel Suisse des Chronomètres, the Official Swiss Chronometer Testing Institute. Again, they can be manual, automatic or quartz. Hope this helps and if I've got anything wrong, I'm sure others will chip in and correct me. |
|
| Author: | Roffensian [ Wed Jul 20, 2011 4:44 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Is this really a Chronomat? |
Sharkmouth wrote: Hope this helps and if I've got anything wrong, I'm sure others will chip in and correct me. Well if you insist..........  The chrono-matic was actually named that way because it was an automatic chronograph, not chronomat. They were actually automatic Navitimers. Other than that, 10 out of 10 young man 
|
|
| Author: | Sharkmouth [ Thu Jul 21, 2011 12:43 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Is this really a Chronomat? |
So 9.5 then? Thanks for the correction. I'd always assumed Chrono-matic derived from Chronomat since it just adds "ic" to the name. |
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC - 8 hours |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |
|