I've included a picture of my old Evo for comparison. On an Arabic Evo dial, all cardinal and minute ticks are long. The subdial font is also different on the Arabic dials than on either the baton or Roman dials. This watch gets the font right, and even has the correct number of ticks on the subdials. And yes, both on Arabic and Roman dial Evos, the date window has an applied surround. On the watch for sale, the date font is off, and the rider tabs aren't as angular as on a real Evo. Also, although the subdial font is technically correct, it looks like it might be a little more bold than on a genuine Evo, although it's hard to tell with these pictures. I'm not sure about the dial color. It could be black and just washed out by the lighting, or it could be Anthracite, which tends to look dark in indirect lighting.
I still vote fake, but to be honest, it's a tough call for me. I'm more confident advising anyone to avoid this auction like the plague: poor photos, no papers, a bogus strap, a high price tag, an 'as is' sale, and a seller with only one feedback rating. It just doesn't pass the smell test.
Edit: I also just noticed he claims it has a multiple time zone function. What a maroon.
