The Breitling Watch Source Forums

Has anyone ever thought these are not the actual pics of the watch?

1.) The date the auction started was March 18th, the date on the watch on the eBay photo is the 3rd.

2.) March 20th, a pic of the watch is posted by Tone with a date of the 7th. Why did the day jump 5, when only 2 days were in between?

Obvious the owner isn't wearing the watch, because either the date would be correct, or the date wouldn't be so different. Of course, the owner could have taken the picture a few days prior to the auction, but I did think of that, and the watch would have stopped if it wasn't on a winder or being worn (if it were on a winder, then why wouldn't you have the correct date though on it).

_________________
End of Discussion.

Yes bnewbie, I asked for better pictures, tbh the watch looked ok to me but then again i'm still learning. As nr123 says my suspicions were raised when he sent a picture of the date showing the 7th.

Case back pic is on the first post and paperwork pic is on eBay.

Terrible pics but s/n appear to match to me.

_________________

For more information on identifying Breitling replicas, please visit my web site
http://f4buz.com/watches/breitling/fakes/fakes.html

To me the 4th digit looks like a 4 on the papers vs an 8 on the watch?

_________________
End of Discussion.

that would be a little too much of a coincidence, wouldn't it ?
6 digits match, the 7th does not ?
If he found such a close match, I'll ask the guy to buy my lottery tickets in the future .....

Can't be sure on the photo like that.
No.2 in the serial looks like on the fakes to me (it has a different shape, all reps have that kind of No.2).
Anyway, can't be sure because of distance in the photo.

S/N looks different to me. So many questions on this one.

_________________
Breitling B-1 1999
Breitling Chrono Superocean 2004
Casio G Shock
Citizen Eco Drive AT4000-02E (for gardening)
Seiko 5 SNZG15J1
Hamilton X Wind LE

Surely the amount of uncertainty in this thread should be enough to steer well clear of this watch. There'll always be another SA out there.

_________________
Driver8

Site Moderator

its fake

Can you elaborate, please?

This should be interesting.

_________________
End of Discussion.

At least its got a gen dial because one the rep pics provided the datewindow cutout is beweled, and on the gen its straight.

_________________
SuperOcean Professional - Yellow dial

Ha - what for? He still had the wrong number

_________________
End of Discussion.

I think that it's not genuine. This is a guess but the breitling logo seems a bit rough and looks poorly made like a fake.

Hope this helps.

_________________
CURRENT

Rolex Explorer ii

PREVIOUS

Breitling Aerospace Repetition Minutes Two Tone Titanium & Gold

Breitling Chrono Colt Quartz Stainless Steel

Regardless of the paperwork I would still buy the seller before the watch. Heck it's pretty easy to photoshop numbers on the papers if you wanted to, so even that's no guarantee it's not a fraud.

As popular as the Super Avenger is there's no reason to take any risk.