I know I should be more supportive of Bremont given they're a British brand, but personally I'm not a fan at all.
I don't think their designs are overly inspiring (obviously that's just a personal opinion), but I'd have absolutely no problem with them as a brand if only their watches were priced accordingly........... BUT unfortunately their prices are plain bonkers!
The circa £4k MBII runs the BE-36AE movement, which is essentially "just" an ETA 2892-A2 (albeit the Chronometer version) with a Bremont rotor, and yet it costs significantly more than the Tudor Black Bay, the Black Bay GMT, and the Omega Seamaster Diver 300 that are all running cutting-edge in-house Chronometer (or better) rated movements, plus Omega and Tudor have infinitely more history and made infinitely more horological advancement and contribution over the years. Hell, even the cheaper Airco is still more expensive than the Tudor BB GMT!
IMO Bremont are just another "no-history" B&R-type brand who think that by pricing high they can suddenly manufacture decades of heritage, brand image and recognition. I always think when brands price themselves above their station that it's a slightly cynical attempt to draw people in with a kind of, "oh, it's expensive so it must be good" kind of mentality. Bear in mind Bremont are a year younger than Steinhart who also produce watches running ETAs and yet they manage to sell their watches for a 1/10th of the price. Obviously I appreciate that Bremont use Chronometer spec ETAs, have all original designs, etc, but I just don't see 10 times the difference in value.
Don't get me wrong, from handling a couple of their pieces I'd say Bremont's build quality is decent and they do use some trick hardened steel for their cases, etc, plus for a commemorative LE piece made for your company then that's fine and I can understand the appeal of picking one up. But if it came down to purely a value proposition, then unless it was a 50% discount I'd personally pass.