sharkman wrote:
What does it prove?
That you got to much time to spare...
Interesting though...
| The Breitling Watch Source Forums https://www.breitlingsource.com/phpBB2/ |
|
| How they are timing https://www.breitlingsource.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=31564 |
Page 1 of 2 |
| Author: | sharkman [ Sun Jul 03, 2011 9:58 am ] |
| Post subject: | How they are timing |
How they are timing over 14 days compared to atomic clock – 1. Cockpit - -0.2 sec/day 2. (tie) Skyracer and GMT master IIc - +1.4 and -1.4 sec/day 4. Sub C - -2.6 secs/day 5. Evo - +2.8 secs/day 6. Steelfish(white) - +3.4 sec/day 7. Navi 01 - +3.8 sec/day 8. CSO - +5.5 sec/day 9. Steelfish (black) - +6.7 sec/day What does it prove? Nothin’! |
|
| Author: | breanach78 [ Sun Jul 03, 2011 11:01 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: How they are timing |
sharkman wrote: What does it prove? That you got to much time to spare... Interesting though...
|
|
| Author: | sharkman [ Sun Jul 03, 2011 11:26 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: How they are timing |
breanach78 wrote: sharkman wrote: What does it prove? That you got to much time to spare... Interesting though... Not hard. Took but a few minutes to set them and check them. Quite a bit easier with 9 watches instead of 30.
|
|
| Author: | boogiebot [ Sun Jul 03, 2011 11:39 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: How they are timing |
shark this might be a stupid question but i just have to ask when you say "Sub C - -2.6 secs/day" does that mean that 14 days later its 36.4 seconds slower than the original time it was set?? |
|
| Author: | sharkman [ Sun Jul 03, 2011 11:41 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: How they are timing |
boogiebot wrote: shark this might be a stupid question but i just have to ask when you say "Sub C - -2.6 secs/day" does that mean that 14 days later its 36.4 seconds slower than the original time it was set?? Yes. Just divided the time difference by 14. |
|
| Author: | Iantheklutz [ Sun Jul 03, 2011 11:55 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: How they are timing |
Sad to see the 01 so low in the rankings, but it's still within COSC. I'll leave my comments about measuring time to the decimal to myself this time. |
|
| Author: | sharkman [ Sun Jul 03, 2011 12:06 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: How they are timing |
Iantheklutz wrote: Sad to see the 01 so low in the rankings, but it's still within COSC. I'll leave my comments about measuring time to the decimal to myself this time. Haven't we had this discussion before??????? What each one tells me is I can have them regulated to run +1/-1 if it was important to me. The next guy's 01 could be dead balls on, or +6. I can live with COSC |
|
| Author: | boogiebot [ Sun Jul 03, 2011 12:18 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: How they are timing |
sharkman wrote: boogiebot wrote: shark this might be a stupid question but i just have to ask when you say "Sub C - -2.6 secs/day" does that mean that 14 days later its 36.4 seconds slower than the original time it was set?? Yes. Just divided the time difference by 14. cool thanks for the clarification. so with the CSO and Steelfish being off by what they are will be sending them in to get tuned up? |
|
| Author: | sharkman [ Sun Jul 03, 2011 12:24 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: How they are timing |
boogiebot wrote: sharkman wrote: boogiebot wrote: shark this might be a stupid question but i just have to ask when you say "Sub C - -2.6 secs/day" does that mean that 14 days later its 36.4 seconds slower than the original time it was set?? Yes. Just divided the time difference by 14. cool thanks for the clarification. so with the CSO and Steelfish being off by what they are will be sending them in to get tuned up? Well they are within COSC - it would be hard to convince BUSA the Fish isn't with COSC at possibly 0.7 secs over the +6 second limit.
|
|
| Author: | boogiebot [ Sun Jul 03, 2011 12:44 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: How they are timing |
true for some strange reason i thought COSC spec was +/- 4 per day. but its actually -4/+6 a day. so no need to send back the CSO. im sure if you made a big enough stink about the Fish they would do it. All you need to do is fax them over all your recipts for the lings you have bought in the last 24 months 
|
|
| Author: | F14D_Tomcat [ Mon Jul 04, 2011 9:07 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: How they are timing |
Just a quick one, are all Steelfishes running on the + side or is it a coincidence? 'cause mine and a friend of mine's are too. |
|
| Author: | sharkman [ Mon Jul 04, 2011 9:25 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: How they are timing |
F14D_Tomcat wrote: Just a quick one, are all Steelfishes running on the + side or is it a coincidence? 'cause mine and a friend of mine's are too. No, I think all you can say is most watches run +. |
|
| Author: | asertway [ Mon Jul 04, 2011 10:06 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: How they are timing |
what is the best way to check this because i dont know if my internet is slow or if i check it 5 days later if ill get the same time? i set it with my phone and i am about +1 a day. |
|
| Author: | sharkman [ Mon Jul 04, 2011 10:11 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: How they are timing |
asertway wrote: what is the best way to check this because i dont know if my internet is slow or if i check it 5 days later if ill get the same time? i set it with my phone and i am about +1 a day. Time.gov is the atomic clock down to seconds. |
|
| Author: | asertway [ Mon Jul 04, 2011 10:23 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: How they are timing |
sharkman wrote: How they are timing over 14 days compared to atomic clock – 1. Cockpit - -0.2 sec/day 2. (tie) Skyracer and GMT master IIc - +1.4 and -1.4 sec/day 4. Sub C - -2.6 secs/day 5. Evo - +2.8 secs/day 6. Steelfish(white) - +3.4 sec/day 7. Navi 01 - +3.8 sec/day 8. CSO - +5.5 sec/day 9. Steelfish (black) - +6.7 sec/day What does it prove? Nothin’! ty sharkman, but why didnt you list that nice watch you received as a present to your watch list ( that nice gavel & justice scale piece) |
|
| Page 1 of 2 | All times are UTC - 8 hours |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |
|