The Breitling Watch Source Forums https://www.breitlingsource.com/phpBB2/ |
|
New Rolex's @ Basel 2011 https://www.breitlingsource.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=28862 |
Page 1 of 2 |
Author: | Gert [ Thu Mar 31, 2011 3:21 am ] |
Post subject: | New Rolex's @ Basel 2011 |
New Black Dial "Orange Hand" Rolex Explorer II & Dark ChocolChocolate Rolex Daytona Rose Gold with All-New Ceramic Bezel @ 2011 BaselWorld Introduction. ![]() ![]() |
Author: | breanach78 [ Thu Mar 31, 2011 4:11 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: New Rolex's @ Basel 2011 |
![]() |
Author: | roman4405 [ Thu Mar 31, 2011 4:18 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: New Rolex's @ Basel 2011 |
I love the Explorer, both the white and black dials but the Daytona doesn't look right to me. That Rose gold version with that dial is the only one that I like, not that I could afford any of them. And I hate how there's not a date on the Daytona, a date isn't really necessary to me, but when the damn thing costs that much I think it should have one.,\ |
Author: | Tim S [ Thu Mar 31, 2011 5:50 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: New Rolex's @ Basel 2011 |
Not a fan of the Daytona but like the explorer a lot! |
Author: | unixshrk [ Thu Mar 31, 2011 7:20 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: New Rolex's @ Basel 2011 |
Tim S wrote: Not a fan of the Daytona but like the explorer a lot! +1 The daytona just doesnt do it for me. |
Author: | Driver8 [ Thu Mar 31, 2011 7:41 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: New Rolex's @ Basel 2011 |
Good to see Rolex making a few "radical" changes (well radical for them!) by putting a ceramic bezel on the Daytona, but neither of those watches do anything for me at all I'm afraid. I personally find the Daytona to be one of the most over-rated watches out there. |
Author: | FEAR [ Thu Mar 31, 2011 8:23 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: New Rolex's @ Basel 2011 |
the daytona would be hot, if it wasnt a woman's sized watch, it doesnt have to be 48mm, but is 44 or 45 out of the question? come on rolex. |
Author: | roman4405 [ Thu Mar 31, 2011 9:19 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: New Rolex's @ Basel 2011 |
FEAR wrote: the daytona would be hot, if it wasnt a woman's sized watch, it doesnt have to be 48mm, but is 44 or 45 out of the question? come on rolex. For Rolex? Yeah, I think it's out of the question. Go on TRF and check out the threads about the 42mm Explorer II. A lot of people act like they started putting rubber bezels on everything. Personally I think 40mm is a bit too small, but I think that there are a lot more people in the world who can pull off a 40mm watch than a 45mm watch. And considering from what I hear it's really hard for people to find SS Daytonas out there. |
Author: | boogiebot [ Thu Mar 31, 2011 9:21 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: New Rolex's @ Basel 2011 |
FEAR wrote: the daytona would be hot, if it wasnt a woman's sized watch, it doesnt have to be 48mm, but is 44 or 45 out of the question? come on rolex. at 41 it does seem on the smaller side. i agree it doesnt have to be 48 but definitiely anything over 42 |
Author: | BroncoSport [ Thu Mar 31, 2011 10:20 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: New Rolex's @ Basel 2011 |
I would buy a GMT IIc before that Explorer (not a fan of the Explorer's bezel), but at least they are moving to man sized watches. I have tried on several Daytona's and although they are small, I kinda like them. This one is pretty cool but between the small size, lack of date and over pricing... I wouldn't even concider buying one. |
Author: | sharkman [ Thu Mar 31, 2011 11:27 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: New Rolex's @ Basel 2011 |
Like the Sub C and the GMT IIc, the Daytona does wear a bit larger on the wist than the stated diameter of 40mm. These and the new Date Just II (41mm) are longer lug end to lug end than most 40-41mm watches. That said, without a date on the Daytona, it remains out of the running for me. It almost was in the running yesterday when I had both a black dial and white dial SS Daytona on the wrist. They are damn nice looking pieces on the wrist. But a monent of clarity intervened and i "just said 'no'" ![]() |
Author: | boogy12 [ Thu Mar 31, 2011 12:17 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: New Rolex's @ Basel 2011 |
I'm actually considering selling my yachtmaster and getting that explorer II. what do you guys think? |
Author: | boogiebot [ Thu Mar 31, 2011 12:24 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: New Rolex's @ Basel 2011 |
its the old yachtmaster and not the yachtmaster II right? if so then i think its a fair trade off. |
Author: | jnelson3097 [ Thu Mar 31, 2011 12:29 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: New Rolex's @ Basel 2011 |
I see one of the moderators of the Roelx forum on TZ said the UK price converted to dollars would be $6,631 according to today's exchange rate. |
Author: | boogy12 [ Thu Mar 31, 2011 12:38 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: New Rolex's @ Basel 2011 |
boogiebot wrote: its the old yachtmaster and not the yachtmaster II right? if so then i think its a fair trade off. Yeah its the old yachtmaster. might go for either the explorer II or the GMT. gotta have at least one rolex in my collection. ![]() |
Page 1 of 2 | All times are UTC - 8 hours |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |