The Breitling Watch Source Forums

Got a chance to look at the no-date (and therefore no cyclops) Submariner twice today, and fell just a tiny bit in love with it. Any thoughts on this particular model? Didn't get a chance to take any wrist shots, unfortunately, but I was definitely taken with it.

Because of the cyclops on most of the other models I'd otherwise be interested in, I hadn't given Rolex too much thought, so I'm curious to hear what opinions other people have on the brand/this watch in particular?

And for the This Thread Is Useless Without Pics crowd:

Snap Anez. I am in dublin this weekend and checked out all the ADs for a sub. I too am falling for a Sub but after today I think I am going to look second hand! ! New with out discount over 6k!. Best I could get, on the old price was with a 5% new today was 5.6k. . . .

_________________
Breanach78

A Few Breitlings.

Are you looking for the date or no-date version? I think that changes quite a bit on the price...

not really sure about that. So i can t say exactly what i priced. I have a friend who has the green bezel 50 ed. But i am told they make more money now then when they were new in 07. As stated only started to check them out but probably will end up with one. . .

_________________
Breanach78

A Few Breitlings.

Well anez... it was nice knowing you, . C'mon, is the weather over there fogging your thinking? Ha!

I too am no fan of the cyclops. The old Sea Dweller w/date would be the only Rolex that would ever come close to my liking.

Otherwise, I know nothing about them.

_________________
Chrono Jetstream
Montbrilliant 1903
Aerospace E79362

Hmmm. Last time I was at the AD, I had meantioned that I don't care for the cyclops and that was one of the reasons for not owning a Rolex. He (might have.... ) said that he new someone (wink wink) that would uncase a Rolex, soak the crystal in some sort of acid to loosen the cyclops, case it back up and pressure test..... That got my attension.

_________________
Breitling Steelfish(black)
Breitling Steelfish(silver)
Panerai PAM 312
Bell & Ross BR03-92 Phantom
Steinhart BreitlingSource LE #5/15

Before You buy any Rolex Pm DAVIDSW from the Rolexforums.. He sold me my Deepsea at a helluva price. I emailed him and told him my budget ,and a week later I got the Deepsea box papers etc etc Simple transaction!! This guy has a Bazillion Rolex sales on the forum.

_________________
One Watch At A Time.

There is no such thing is darkness; only the absence of light.


On topic, I really do enjoy the Sub C I recently picked up. The glide lock clasp is everything the Deep Sea clasp is not. And I do like an entirely brushed bracelet given the link style on the Rolex bracelets. Personal preference.

_________________
SHARKMAN

Completely agree, I bought my SeaDweller from him and would deal with him again without any hesitation.

The no-date Sub is a great watch. It's slightly older in design than the date model - case is 0.5mm smaller in diameter, and the bracelet has hollow end links.

You can remove the cyclops from the date models, but I believe it's a bit more complicated with the newer models because there is AR coating under the cyclops which also has to be removed.

I will say this - having owned at least 6 cyclops watches, the rolex cyclops is in a league of it's own. It doesn't give off wierd images and is crisp, clear, perfect in function. The single worst one - bar none - was on the Pam 287. They must get those from the same folks who make prizes for Crackerjacks boxes. Even the Xezo cyclops was better.

_________________
SHARKMAN

Ain't nothin wrong with Rolex. I've been dying for either a SubC, a GMTIIc or an Explorer II. I think the Sub No Date is actually a great looking watch, very classic styled Rolex but I think that not having a date would drive me nuts. Still I really like them and think that they're great looking watches. I know that you've mentioned having small wrists, being a girl and all, and personally I think Subs look great on women, at 40mm they're small enough that you can pull it off but also big enough to look like a big watch. Did that makes sense? Cameron Diaz wears one in the movie Night & Day, horrible movie by the way, but the watch looks good on her.

_________________
"Leave the gun, take the cannoli."

Then again, I am a bit biased on Rolex.

_________________


- This is Ghost Rider requesting a fly-by. - Negative Ghost Rider. The pattern is full.

All hail Rolex

_________________
Chrono Avenger M1, Ti- yellow dial, on Pro II Ti bracelet.
Avenger Code Yellow LE, on Diver Pro II strap, w/arabic dial.

Nice choice. It's got such a classic look that so many other manufacturers try to emulate and while I do prefer a watch without a cyclops (a deterrent from me buying a Panerai sooner), for some reason, they work on a Rolex. Your particular model is beautiful and very similar to the DeepSea which I'd like to get someday due to its larger size and absence of a cyclops.

And don't think of it going to the dark side - consider it a broadening of your horizons.

Good luck!

_________________
************* ************************ **********
PAM359, Omega PO Big Size, 1951 Omega Seamaster, Rolex Sea Dweller

I am seriously considering the sea-dweller as my next pickup near the end of this year. The hard thing is to find a good one used since its discontinued.

EDIT: just found this video on youtube showing the sea dweller in more detail

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rC7rDXSzuvI

_________________
Alex
Breitling - Navitimer
Breitling - SuperOcean
Breitling - Chrono SuperOcean