The Breitling Watch Source Forums

Breitling Watch Information Forums, Navitimer, Chronomat
It is currently Mon Apr 29, 2024 8:23 am

All times are UTC - 8 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 29 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Dec 09, 2010 2:54 pm 
Offline
Breitling Fanatic
Breitling Fanatic

Joined: Sun Feb 07, 2010 1:22 am
Posts: 396
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 0 post
Location: Utah
:santa: That was a Holiday gift enough for me. Thanks for taking the time to really enlighten us on a consumer level as opposed to the usual editorial advertisement that we get from Watch Journal, and other magazines!

Awesome pics as always!

_________________
Breitling Emergency Mission-- Breitling B01--
Chronomatic 24H-- Skyland Blacksteel-- Navitimer World--
Emergency Ti-- Chronomat Evo-- Airwolf-- Skyracer Raven
Bentley GMT-- Motors Speed


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Dec 10, 2010 12:44 am 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2007 10:24 am
Posts: 2681
Likes: 3 posts
Liked in: 71 posts
Location: Dhahran KSA
Thanks for the comments guys, especially considering my limited English language skills :oops: glad that the review was useful though!


ricardo wrote:
Looking forward to as many more of these comparison reviews as you can provide. Although, having done a few inferior but just as lengthy pieces myself, I can definitely appreciate the time and effort that goes into an article like this.
.


Ricardo, I have always enjoyed your excellent and well though out reviews! I wouldn't call them inferior in any way and I look forward to more!

_________________
Certified watch nut.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Dec 10, 2010 1:07 am 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2007 10:24 am
Posts: 2681
Likes: 3 posts
Liked in: 71 posts
Location: Dhahran KSA
Driver8 wrote:

It's also refreshing to see another IWC owner prepared to come clean about their timekeeping issues with the 7 day movement. I heartily agree with your comments that it's an absolute DISGRACE that IWC cannot sort it out on a movement that lives inside watches costing around £10K GBP.


Actually it seems like quite a few people have the same issue and are now coming forward with those claims. My BP was fairly accurate initially but not sure what went wrong, regardless I have halted all my future IWC plans untill they resolve these issue, and I am contemplating selling the BP if it is not :(

_________________
Certified watch nut.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Dec 10, 2010 3:46 am 
Offline
Breitling Fanatic
Breitling Fanatic

Joined: Mon Nov 02, 2009 2:58 pm
Posts: 209
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 0 post
Great review and very nice pics too!


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Dec 10, 2010 4:54 am 
Offline
King of Ling
King of Ling

Joined: Sun Dec 20, 2009 10:20 pm
Posts: 2617
Likes: 221 posts
Liked in: 809 posts
Location: Newcastle, Australia
Great review! Now if i could just getting around to affording either of them...


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Dec 10, 2010 5:56 am 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 21, 2010 5:00 am
Posts: 1095
Likes: 21 posts
Liked in: 5 posts
Location: Gotham
Great review Altair. I am really looking forward to the FF vs. Seals Alarm comparison.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sat Dec 11, 2010 6:34 am 
Offline
Breitling Fanatic
Breitling Fanatic

Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 8:58 am
Posts: 495
Likes: 4 posts
Liked in: 0 post
Location: Astoria, NY
Great Review Altair!

Awesome Pictures & A Great Read - Looking Forward To Other Reviews!

Cheers,

Enezdez

_________________
IWC - Big Pilot 5002 - 01
IWC - Pilot Chrono 3717 - 04
Panerai - 183
Omega - Speedmaster 145.012 / 67
Rolex - Explore II (Black Dial) - 216570
Rolex - Explore I 114270
Blancpain FF 5015


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sat Dec 11, 2010 1:43 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 5:02 pm
Posts: 2200
Likes: 20 posts
Liked in: 13 posts
Location: Fort Worth, Texas
Another superb review Altair, thanks again for taking the time. What a great read, particularly from someone with more than a passing interest on the subject and someone who is well read and informed on the subject matter at hand!

I really can't get past the movement problems with that particular IWC calibre. Unbelievable. I presume their working on a solution, any idea as to how's it going?

Looking forward to the rest when you find the time.

_________________
Happines is Good Health and a Bad Memory.
"Ingrid Bergman"


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sat Dec 11, 2010 2:15 pm 
Offline
Contributing Moderator
Contributing Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 5:09 am
Posts: 36521
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 489 posts
Location: Ontario, Canada
Tim S wrote:
I presume their working on a solution, any idea as to how's it going?




I'm sure that they are internally, but given that they haven't acknowledged any issues with the movement there will just be a (likely unannounced) "minor update" to the movmeent when it's ready.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sat Dec 11, 2010 3:19 pm 
Offline
Contributing Moderator
Contributing Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 24, 2007 11:39 am
Posts: 12837
Likes: 148 posts
Liked in: 519 posts
Location: UK
Roffensian wrote:
Tim S wrote:
I presume their working on a solution, any idea as to how's it going?




I'm sure that they are internally, but given that they haven't acknowledged any issues with the movement there will just be a (likely unannounced) "minor update" to the movmeent when it's ready.

Frankly I think they need to up the beat rate from 21,600 to 28,800. Maybe they'd find it easier to regulate then. :?

_________________
Driver8

Site Moderator
Image


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sat Dec 11, 2010 3:49 pm 
Offline
Contributing Moderator
Contributing Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 5:09 am
Posts: 36521
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 489 posts
Location: Ontario, Canada
Driver8 wrote:
Roffensian wrote:
Tim S wrote:
I presume their working on a solution, any idea as to how's it going?




I'm sure that they are internally, but given that they haven't acknowledged any issues with the movement there will just be a (likely unannounced) "minor update" to the movmeent when it's ready.

Frankly I think they need to up the beat rate from 21,600 to 28,800. Maybe they'd find it easier to regulate then. :?



That would certainly help, and there's no reason for a modern movement to be as slow as 3Hz, at least not a relatively simple movement like this (in terms of complications). I'm sure that it's to help with power reserve, but there are plenty of ways to solve that problem too.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sat Dec 11, 2010 11:38 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2007 10:24 am
Posts: 2681
Likes: 3 posts
Liked in: 71 posts
Location: Dhahran KSA
Driver8 wrote:
Roffensian wrote:
Tim S wrote:
I presume their working on a solution, any idea as to how's it going?




I'm sure that they are internally, but given that they haven't acknowledged any issues with the movement there will just be a (likely unannounced) "minor update" to the movmeent when it's ready.

Frankly I think they need to up the beat rate from 21,600 to 28,800. Maybe they'd find it easier to regulate then. :?


Not sure thats a solution myself, many companies have modern movements that have a 21,600 BPS such as the Jaeger Caliber 360 found in the Duometre, teh rationale is that 21,600 is a compromise between the enhanced accuracy of the 2800,00 movements and the reliabilty and low maintenance of 18000 movements. The IWC caliber does not succeed in both and I am certain it is a design issue rather than a technology issue. Especially since most of the watches with reported issues started out keeping very good time, so I dont think its a regulation issue at all.

I just came back today from the IWC dealership and I handed in both my watches, I told them that I will not pick up the watches untill they are fixed this time and that I will be communicating with IWC Switzerland directely about this issue, I am formulating the email now and plan to do a public post on their official forum. Pending IWC's response to this as an organisation, I expect the watches to be repaired to at least a passable level of accurace (+-8 seconds a day) or I will simply sell both watches and boycot the brand altogether (even though no other models in their lineup exhibit these issue) as a matter of principal. If I am not respected as a consumer, how can I respect them as a brand?

Besides, Jaeger continues to over achieve with their lineup at similar prices.

_________________
Certified watch nut.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sun Dec 12, 2010 9:35 am 
Offline
Contributing Moderator
Contributing Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 24, 2007 11:39 am
Posts: 12837
Likes: 148 posts
Liked in: 519 posts
Location: UK
Altair wrote:
Driver8 wrote:
Frankly I think they need to up the beat rate from 21,600 to 28,800. Maybe they'd find it easier to regulate then. :?


Not sure thats a solution myself, many companies have modern movements that have a 21,600 BPS such as the Jaeger Caliber 360 found in the Duometre, teh rationale is that 21,600 is a compromise between the enhanced accuracy of the 2800,00 movements and the reliabilty and low maintenance of 18000 movements. The IWC caliber does not succeed in both and I am certain it is a design issue rather than a technology issue. Especially since most of the watches with reported issues started out keeping very good time, so I dont think its a regulation issue at all.

I completely agree that a slow beat doesn't necssarily mean inaccuracy per se, and you are quite correct about plenty of other manufacturers managing to make 21,600 movements accurate. Take the Unitas 6497 for example. However, unless IWC completely redesign the 7 day movement, I think that increasing the beat rate might at least go some way to help the situation. I'm starting to think it's just a poor design.

Altair wrote:
I just came back today from the IWC dealership and I handed in both my watches, I told them that I will not pick up the watches untill they are fixed this time and that I will be communicating with IWC Switzerland directely about this issue, I am formulating the email now and plan to do a public post on their official forum. Pending IWC's response to this as an organisation, I expect the watches to be repaired to at least a passable level of accurace (+-8 seconds a day) or I will simply sell both watches and boycot the brand altogether (even though no other models in their lineup exhibit these issue) as a matter of principal. If I am not respected as a consumer, how can I respect them as a brand?

I'll be very interested to see how this latest action by you turns out Altair. Please keep us informed.

_________________
Driver8

Site Moderator
Image


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sun Dec 12, 2010 11:00 am 
Offline
King of Ling
King of Ling
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 19, 2010 1:51 am
Posts: 1924
Likes: 3 posts
Liked in: 12 posts
Location: Virginia Beach
It's pretty sad that a company like IWC can't get their "Flagship" watch, the BP, to perform like a "Flagship" watch should. It's a shame because I absolutely love the BP but I'd never buy one with a movement that's as suspect as this one seems to be. Good luck with getting yours fixed.

_________________
"Leave the gun, take the cannoli."


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 29 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC - 8 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 76 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
 




Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group