The Breitling Watch Source Forums https://www.breitlingsource.com/phpBB2/ |
|
MIL-SPEC https://www.breitlingsource.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=20578 |
Page 1 of 1 |
Author: | Palantas [ Tue Jun 29, 2010 10:56 am ] |
Post subject: | MIL-SPEC |
I was looking at the Marathon SAR recently, and that inspired me to getting my hands on the military performance specification for wristwatches. You hear “MIL-SPEC” all the time, and see it advertised on some sites, but what does it actually say? Well, I’ll tell you. ![]() The relevant regulation is MIL-PRF-46374G. I went through it to determine how close my Superocean is to being a MIL-SPEC watch. Below are the relevant sections pulled from the MIL-PRF. See if your watch meets military standards. ![]() We will be looking at Type II and Type III, Class 4 watches: Mechanical, maintainable, anti-magnetic, water-resistant, high-altitude, and corrosion-resistant. Type III includes an elapsed time ring (diving bezel). Case
Dial
Movement
Operation
Bezel (for Type III)
Accuracy
Lume
Durability
Other
My Superocean fails the non-reflective finish requirement. I’m not sure any Breitlings meet the bezel standard, being black with white markers. The requirement for minute markers from 12 to 4 also kicks out a great number of diver's watches that only go to 15 minutes. I also don't think there are any Breitlings which don't say "Breiting" on them, therefore failing the requirement of not having any logos or manufacturer text on the dieal. All of our watches should handily exceed the accuracy requirements, however. The standard for quartz watches at the high and low temperatures is only +/- 3 seconds, which is achievable for a well-tuned mechanical. |
Author: | Altair [ Tue Jun 29, 2010 10:48 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: MIL-SPEC |
Very interesting! The only watch that I have that qualifies is my special edition Steinhart pilot, which does not have the logo or name on the dial. |
Author: | Otto [ Tue Jun 29, 2010 10:53 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: MIL-SPEC |
Fascinating, some pretty strict requirements there! I'd still have a 5517 Mil-Sub even though it doesn't fulfil a lot of those criteria. ![]() I think the closest I have are my two Luminoxes. |
Author: | Iantheklutz [ Wed Jun 30, 2010 4:39 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: MIL-SPEC |
Interesting. I'm surprised the accuracy specs are so low. Figured they'd be a bit more strict about how much time is gained/lost. |
Author: | roman4405 [ Wed Jun 30, 2010 6:31 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: MIL-SPEC |
Iantheklutz wrote: Interesting. I'm surprised the accuracy specs are so low. Figured they'd be a bit more strict about how much time is gained/lost. Maybe that's why I used to have to relieve the watch 15 minutes early ![]() |
Author: | Palantas [ Wed Jun 30, 2010 11:41 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: MIL-SPEC |
I should add that there are a smattering of other specs in the MIL-PRF that I didn't feel like including. Example: There's a minimum standard for how easy the bezel turns based on some application of torque (or something like that). Iantheklutz wrote: I'm surprised the accuracy specs are so low. Figured they'd be a bit more strict about how much time is gained/lost. Same here. Those accuracy standards are for the higher-spec'd Type II and Type III watches. For Type I (disposable), they're double that. That is, one minute at normal temperature, and two minutes at high/low temperatures, per day. |
Author: | Tim S [ Thu Jul 01, 2010 5:46 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: MIL-SPEC |
Very interesting. I'm also surprised by the timing requirements. |
Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC - 8 hours |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |