The SMP is a classic just like the Navitimer or the Submariner. I can never decide if I prefer the 2531.80.00 or the 2254.50.00. I used to have a 2531.80.00, traded it for a 2254.50.00 then sold it because I preferred my Sub! I'll probably end up buying another 2531.80.00.

I don't get too excited about Omega/Swatch's new in-house co-axial movement compared to the older cal.1120/ETA 2892. If it does the job, it's good enough for me.

Your friend can't go wrong with a Seamaster Pro. But make sure he/she tries the Steelfish or even the Super Avenger before making up they're mind!

I think he may be better off with an older Seamaster as Omega's new pricing is making them less and less of a bargain as they head more and more into a status symbol battle with Rolex. Just my two cents.

I'm not sure I agree that they are anywhere close to rolex in terms of status symbol. I'd put Omega in Breitlings category, one step down from Rolex.

I have two Speedmaster Pros and a POC all great watches.

I'm a big Omega fan, as many of you know. There's something about the design and the finish that really does it for me. I won't say what I think of Omega relative to Breitling lest it get me into trouble on this forum.

The co-axial non-chrono movement in my PO is great. It is by far the easiest and smoothest winding movement in any of my watches, in fact it is a pleasure to wind it, and I've been very happy with the accuracy. Having said that, like Sharky, I think the non-co-axial movement is great too. Models such as the 2254.50.00 are definite classics and there will always be a market for them second-hand.

bnewbie - agree completely, that white Speedy looks fantastic.

Incidentally, I measured the Speedy's accuracy over 24 hours a couple of times, and it returned +0 (or -0 if you prefer). Might have to try a longer trial, if I can remember to keep it wound.