The Breitling Watch Source Forums

Breitling Watch Information Forums, Navitimer, Chronomat
It is currently Mon May 05, 2025 2:13 pm

All times are UTC - 8 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 46 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Titanium vs Steel
PostPosted: Sat Nov 20, 2010 4:30 pm 
Offline
Contributing Moderator
Contributing Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 24, 2007 11:39 am
Posts: 12837
Likes: 148 posts
Liked in: 520 posts
Location: UK
Nope. The nearest we can get to "bear (bare) arms" in the UK is wearing a T-shirt! :wink:

As far as I know Breitling have no plans for any different metal watches, so I think tungsten Navis are one heck of a way off. To be honest i think part of the reason it's not more widespread is that it's damn hard to work with. I get the impression you can't do a lot of fine casting / engraving with it. I just don't think it'd lend itself to Breitlings designs too well. Shame 'cause it's a great metal for watches.

_________________
Driver8

Site Moderator
Image


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Titanium vs Steel
PostPosted: Sat Nov 20, 2010 4:35 pm 
Offline
Breitling Fanatic
Breitling Fanatic

Joined: Wed May 26, 2010 2:21 pm
Posts: 297
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 0 post
Location: MD
anez wrote:
That's very interesting, I wonder if the Grade 2 is lighter or if there's a big difference in price? Pity they don't use the stronger alloy either way...

I prefer titanium for larger watches because of the lightness, but there's no getting away from the fact that the steel is visually more striking.


Grade 2 would be far easier on machining tools than Gr5. A serious fabrication line will be setup for Ti or steel with different coatings on tooling for Ti to keep tool life up. For example, drilling through Gr5 Ti can destroy a standard drill bit in about five holes, even with coolant and monitoring speed. I've never personally worked with Gr1 since it really isn't that popular. Gr5 and Gr23 (or 6-4 ELI) are much more common and aren't that difficult to work with proper tools. I wouldn't so much guess it is a material cost issue for Breitling as it is a manufacturing cost issue.

_________________
Steelfish GMT LE (white)


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Titanium vs Steel
PostPosted: Mon Nov 22, 2010 5:40 am 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2007 10:24 am
Posts: 2681
Likes: 3 posts
Liked in: 71 posts
Location: Dhahran KSA
Good points Driver and I concur, in my earlier reviews I had noticed that Breitlings use of Titanium was subpar, and that my JLC and Panerai Ti models where far superior. I think this is one reason Titanium seems to have a bad rap around here.

About Tungsten, glad to hear that you find the material favorable! I have a new Tungsten case watch coming in myself! Wont say much at this point, but it has a in house skeleton movement, is an ultra rare version of a limited run, the original 500 all had Tungsten cases and bezels, but mine is one of ten factory modified with a saphire bezel. Those in the know I am sure recognize what I am talking about :D :D :D :D :D

_________________
Certified watch nut.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Titanium vs Steel
PostPosted: Mon Nov 22, 2010 5:47 am 
Offline
Contributing Moderator
Contributing Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 5:09 am
Posts: 36521
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 489 posts
Location: Ontario, Canada
Altair wrote:
Good points Driver and I concur, in my earlier reviews I had noticed that Breitlings use of Titanium was subpar, and that my JLC and Panerai Ti models where far superior. I think this is one reason Titanium seems to have a bad rap around here.

About Tungsten, glad to hear that you find the material favorable! I have a new Tungsten case watch coming in myself! Wont say much at this point, but it has a in house skeleton movement, is an ultra rare version of a limited run, the original 500 all had Tungsten cases and bezels, but mine is one of ten factory modified with a saphire bezel. Those in the know I am sure recognize what I am talking about :D :D :D :D :D



:huh

If you had said the original run was 999 pieces I would have been there, need to think about 500.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Titanium vs Steel
PostPosted: Mon Nov 22, 2010 5:53 am 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2007 10:24 am
Posts: 2681
Likes: 3 posts
Liked in: 71 posts
Location: Dhahran KSA
Well leave it to you Roff, not only to guess the right watch but even with an unintentional curve ball thrown in. I was thinking of the other watch I have incoming, this one is 999 piece!

_________________
Certified watch nut.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Titanium vs Steel
PostPosted: Mon Nov 22, 2010 6:11 am 
Offline
Contributing Moderator
Contributing Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 5:09 am
Posts: 36521
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 489 posts
Location: Ontario, Canada
Altair wrote:
Well leave it to you Roff, not only to guess the right watch but even with an unintentional curve ball thrown in. I was thinking of the other watch I have incoming, this one is 999 piece!



:lol:

Glad that my brain hasn't died just yet. Looking forward to seeing the pictures, it's a nice skeleton movement.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Titanium vs Steel
PostPosted: Mon Nov 22, 2010 7:47 am 
Offline
Contributing Moderator
Contributing Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 24, 2007 11:39 am
Posts: 12837
Likes: 148 posts
Liked in: 520 posts
Location: UK
Hmmmm, the only watch I can think of that matches that description (i.e. tungsten, skeleton dial and an LE of 999) is made by a manufacturer whose name starts with "H" and ends in "ublot"! :shock:

_________________
Driver8

Site Moderator
Image


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Titanium vs Steel
PostPosted: Mon Nov 22, 2010 8:17 am 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2007 10:24 am
Posts: 2681
Likes: 3 posts
Liked in: 71 posts
Location: Dhahran KSA
Well yes, you got it as well Driver. Cantget anything past this nerdy crowd :lol:

Yes I know, I am a sellout! I didnt like the Big Bangs initially, mainely due to the large number of variations, many of which where quite ugly IMO and the fact they they all used ETA movements. But since they came out with an in house model that had a different enough case, a skeleton in house movement, and are using high tech materials, well ive been contemplating that model. The only thing holding me back was that the all tugnsten version was a bit bland visually. Needless to say, when I was offered the rare ceramic bezel version and at a reasonable price, well you know me and my will power :lol:

Sorry to hi jack your thread D, will keep the rest for my upcoming review.

_________________
Certified watch nut.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Titanium vs Steel
PostPosted: Mon Nov 22, 2010 11:20 am 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 09, 2010 10:34 am
Posts: 965
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 0 post
Location: Newtown, PA
Great post D8. I've owned a few Ti (grade 2) watches and they have all been disappointing with respect to their ability to hold a finish. They always end up looking like one big swirl mark. Not attractive. It's a shame, IMO, that Breitling hasn't yet taken the next step and elevated the use of their materials.

Driver8 wrote:
Various other hardening processes can be applied (such as "ice hardening" as used by Sinn on some of their watches)


Sinn has most famously used iced hardened cases in the past - they were supplied by another company called Damasko. Damasko owns the patents for the "ice hardening" process. This process, as you mentioned, hardens the entire case to ~700 Vickers. These days, Sinn sells "Tegimented" watches cases. This treatment is a bit different in that it effectively hardens just the outermost shell of the case to ~1200 Vickers. It's difficult to tell the difference between these treatments on the surface because they both just end up looking matte.

The partnership between Sinn and Damasko ended at some point and Damasko is now making their own watches. I've actually decided to get their DA36 for my flieger-style watch. I was a little apprehensive about their lack of "heritage" but the watch and the technology used is interesting enough to warrant the purchase.

_________________
“The only reason for time is so that everything doesn't happen at once.” - Albert Einstein


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Titanium vs Steel
PostPosted: Mon Nov 22, 2010 11:54 am 
Offline
Contributing Moderator
Contributing Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 24, 2007 11:39 am
Posts: 12837
Likes: 148 posts
Liked in: 520 posts
Location: UK
Iantheklutz wrote:
Great post D8. I've owned a few Ti (grade 2) watches and they have all been disappointing with respect to their ability to hold a finish. They always end up looking like one big swirl mark. Not attractive. It's a shame, IMO, that Breitling hasn't yet taken the next step and elevated the use of their materials.

Driver8 wrote:
Various other hardening processes can be applied (such as "ice hardening" as used by Sinn on some of their watches)


Sinn has most famously used iced hardened cases in the past - they were supplied by another company called Damasko. Damasko owns the patents for the "ice hardening" process. This process, as you mentioned, hardens the entire case to ~700 Vickers. These days, Sinn sells "Tegimented" watches cases. This treatment is a bit different in that it effectively hardens just the outermost shell of the case to ~1200 Vickers. It's difficult to tell the difference between these treatments on the surface because they both just end up looking matte.

The partnership between Sinn and Damasko ended at some point and Damasko is now making their own watches. I've actually decided to get their DA36 for my flieger-style watch. I was a little apprehensive about their lack of "heritage" but the watch and the technology used is interesting enough to warrant the purchase.

Yes, good points Ian. I actually had a tegimented Sinn UX a little while back that also benefited from being made from submarine steel. One possible issue with tegimenting (rather like DLC actually) however is that it's effectively putting a very hard but very thin outer surface on the steel. This can apparently lead to the so-called "egg-shell" effect whereby the a hard enough impact with a pointed edge can dent the underlying substrate (i.e. the steel) and crack the tough tegimented surface, kind of like an egg-shell. I say apparently, because I've never actually seen an example of the egg-shell effect in pictures. The ice hardening used by Damasko is allegedly effective throughout the metal as you rightly say, although I have read that it's pretty difficulty to say how far the hardening process extends into the metal.

I really like a couple of pieces by Damasko, but they tend to be a little small, and I've never been totally sold on the very matt, tool look of the steel.

(PS - Altair - I'm reserving judgement on your new Hublot until I see it! :wink: I didn't know they'd finally ventured into the in-house arena.)

_________________
Driver8

Site Moderator
Image


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Titanium vs Steel
PostPosted: Mon Nov 22, 2010 12:31 pm 
Offline
King of Ling
King of Ling
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 19, 2010 1:51 am
Posts: 1924
Likes: 3 posts
Liked in: 13 posts
Location: Virginia Beach
Driver8 wrote:

(PS - Altair - I'm reserving judgement on your new Hublot until I see it! :wink: I didn't know they'd finally ventured into the in-house arena.)


I was thinking the same thing, I'm curious to see how the Hublot performs.

I never heard the eggshell thing about the tegmented steel, interesting. I still want a U1 though, maybe I'll test it out :shock:

_________________
"Leave the gun, take the cannoli."


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Titanium vs Steel
PostPosted: Mon Nov 22, 2010 4:10 pm 
Offline
Wild Ling, You Make my Heart Sing!
Wild Ling, You Make my Heart Sing!
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 11, 2008 12:27 pm
Posts: 4302
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 0 post
Location: Los Angeles
I have some Ping irons that have titanium faces. I just gave one of them a good look, and its looks excellent and even still has the bead blasted finish on it. Keep in mind that this thing has hit hundreds or thousands of balls, rocks, sticks etc. Anybody know what grade of titanium this could be?

_________________
-RJ


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Titanium vs Steel
PostPosted: Mon Nov 22, 2010 4:23 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 14, 2010 6:37 am
Posts: 3785
Likes: 1 post
Liked in: 20 posts
Location: USA
RJRJRJ wrote:
I have some Ping irons that have titanium faces. I just gave one of them a good look, and its looks excellent and even still has the bead blasted finish on it. Keep in mind that this thing has hit hundreds or thousands of balls, rocks, sticks etc. Anybody know what grade of titanium this could be?


I'd say it's grade FOREEEEEEEEEEEEE. :uplaugh:

_________________
"I don't own any watches, I just lease them"


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Titanium vs Steel
PostPosted: Mon Nov 22, 2010 5:08 pm 
Offline
Breitling Enthusiast
Breitling Enthusiast
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2010 4:00 pm
Posts: 75
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 0 post
I prefer the steel in my 1911 too. For mass, balance and long term wearability, similar to my watches now that I think of it, even though I own a titanium Aerospace. The big issue with the carry weight of a 1911 has more to do with those damn lead things I shove up the grip.

_________________
Breitling Aerospace
Breitling Chronomat Evolution
Breitling Bentley GMT Midnight Carbon LE
Corum Admiral's Cup Black Flag LE
Rolex Datejust
Tag Heuer Aquaracer
IWC Portuguese Automatic 7 day
VIP Time Italy ref-15043
Glashutte Original Panoinverse XL


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Titanium vs Steel
PostPosted: Tue Nov 23, 2010 1:27 am 
Offline
King of Ling
King of Ling
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 19, 2010 1:51 am
Posts: 1924
Likes: 3 posts
Liked in: 13 posts
Location: Virginia Beach
mfserge wrote:
RJRJRJ wrote:
I have some Ping irons that have titanium faces. I just gave one of them a good look, and its looks excellent and even still has the bead blasted finish on it. Keep in mind that this thing has hit hundreds or thousands of balls, rocks, sticks etc. Anybody know what grade of titanium this could be?


I'd say it's grade FOREEEEEEEEEEEEE. :uplaugh:


:roll:

_________________
"Leave the gun, take the cannoli."


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 46 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

All times are UTC - 8 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 26 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
 




Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group