RJRJRJ wrote:
I think you might be surprised. Of the big brands, id say that Rolex and Panerai have the least amount of variation across the product lines. These two also have the largest cult followings of just about any watch brand out there. Just as its not uncommon for somebody to own 5 or 10 Rolexes that look almost identical, its not all that rare to find a PAM owner who owns a bunch. Its actually kind of weird.
As for quality, I also cant tell a difference between Breitling and Panerai, but small details/features like the strap quick change system on the PAMs are far superior to what Breitling offers. Then again, they definitely make you pay big $$$.
I understand that Rolex and Panerai enjoy a large devout group of followers, just as Breitling has a large group of ardent admirers too. Panerai and Rolex appeal to me on different levels, but I also think Rolex offers a larger distinct variation in their line of products than Panerai does.
Without a doubt, Panerai's innovative quick strap change system is very innovative and
probably provides much of the allure the Panerai enthusiast has for the brand. Of course that is just an estimated guess on my part, but accessorizing one's watches with the various straps and bracelets available adds a new dimension to the enjoyment one gets from their collection.
I agree with ya RJRJRJ, it does seem kind of weird to collect brand specific pieces that are so similar in looks and design. It is a concept that I don't subscribe to, but I'm not going to down anyone for the direction of their collection (not implying you are RJRJRJ...

). Collecting is supposed to be fun and everyone derives their own personal levels of enjoyment from pursuing this hobby, whatever the reason.
@Drtymrtini: I didn't mean to imply "diversity" = "distinction", nor imply that it will motivate
everyone to become a collector. My point was; with a more robust line of options, Breitling positions itself to appeal to a broader customer base. I agree that under the hood many Breitling models are powered by the same engines, but with a larger list of options in colors and faces, this enables Breitling to appeal to a broader market compared to (IE: Panerai). The reality is and I'm generalizing here, buyers are first attracted/detracted to certain models/brands by their outward appearance. If one doesn't agree with that, look no further than Breitling's new offering with the "Crayola Playdough" bezels. For
most folks it wouldn't matter what was tickin' under the hood, they find the looks offensive and wouldn't own one on a dare.
Please don't take my opinion as Panerai Bashing, I just feel they could expand their appeal to a broader market by producing more stylish diversity in their line, while capitalizing on their positive attributes. As witnessed in this thread already, Panerai has a more polarizing effect with an either "Ya Love Em" or "Ya Hate Em" opinion than most other brands. Of course Panerai doesn't corner the market on this type of sentiment from the masses either, just look at Graham or AP for instance.
Drtymrtini, you put it well when you said:
Drtymrtini wrote:
There's no right or wrong answer here - at the end of the day - a $10.00 Timex tells time just as well as my Ling or Panerai or Omega - but it's "everything else" that draws us to a watch. I would assume most of us on this forum would agree that it's not about telling time - it's how we keep time.