The Breitling Watch Source Forums
https://www.breitlingsource.com/phpBB2/

Too good to be true?
https://www.breitlingsource.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?f=31&t=61586		 Page 1 of 1
Author:  Mortys [ Mon Nov 14, 2016 6:30 am ]
Post subject:  Too good to be true?
Wonder what are the ideas of experts about this cosmonaute? How original is this one?

https://www.chrono24.nl/breitling/navit ... 183681.htm
Author:  Dracha [ Mon Nov 14, 2016 6:37 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Too good to be true?
does look stunning
I cant see the lume well enough to see if its relume or not
Author:  Mortys [ Mon Nov 14, 2016 6:42 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Too good to be true?
Thank you Dracha!
I read some where the lifetime of the tritium lume is about 12 years. So if this claim is true, then i would say the dial is re-lumed professionally.
Author:  WatchFred [ Mon Nov 14, 2016 6:44 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Too good to be true?
miracle or (excellent) relume; don't believe in miracles
Author:  Mortys [ Mon Nov 14, 2016 6:48 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Too good to be true?
is the crystal and the movement original?
Author:  WatchFred [ Mon Nov 14, 2016 7:18 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Too good to be true?
yes, though it is interesting to see a non-WOG in a 1966 case w/ a pre-66 dial & sliderule
Author:  Mortys [ Mon Nov 14, 2016 8:04 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Too good to be true?
WatchFred wrote:
yes, though it is interesting to see a non-WOG in a 1966 case w/ a pre-66 dial & sliderule



Means the watch is put together from different years or is a unique chance to have one of a kind Cosmonaute ;)?
Author:  WatchFred [ Mon Nov 14, 2016 8:17 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Too good to be true?
the WOG-marking is not a huge issue, as it' s close to the cut off period in '67; just interesting to see that transition, don't remember seeing that before.

have more of an issue w/ the (assumed) relume, although it is excellent

we would need hi res pics to say more
Page 1 of 1 All times are UTC - 8 hours
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
https://www.phpbb.com/