not commenting on delusional Mr. Maerz listings, San
though I just did
| The Breitling Watch Source Forums https://www.breitlingsource.com/phpBB2/ |
|
| An original 785? https://www.breitlingsource.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?f=31&t=47972 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | cruvon [ Thu Jun 13, 2013 6:28 am ] |
| Post subject: | An original 785? |
http://www.chrono24.com/au/breitling/da ... Findex.htm |
|
| Author: | WatchFred [ Thu Jun 13, 2013 6:58 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: An original 785? |
not commenting on delusional Mr. Maerz listings, San though I just did
|
|
| Author: | cruvon [ Fri Jun 14, 2013 8:19 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: An original 785? |
WatchFred wrote: not commenting on delusional Mr. Maerz listings, San though I just did Lol, understandable! |
|
| Author: | cruvon [ Fri Jun 21, 2013 5:03 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: An original 785? |
It's on eBay now http://www.ebay.com/itm/BREITLING-18ct- ... 33829d5c94 |
|
| Author: | Roffensian [ Fri Jun 21, 2013 5:21 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: An original 785? |
So why are we giving it exposure? |
|
| Author: | cruvon [ Fri Jun 21, 2013 5:23 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: An original 785? |
Roffensian wrote: So why are we giving it exposure? So that no one buys it:) |
|
| Author: | WatchFred [ Fri Jun 21, 2013 5:26 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: An original 785? |
Roffensian wrote: So why are we giving it exposure? absolutely right, Roff. google is a b*tch, people might actually see this thread, so now we will have to say that it is not only priced WAY above fair market, but: dial refinished w/ incorrect logo for period balance bridge incorrectly (very!) marked correctors for date/month are very strange, to put it mildly quite a poor specimen, like almost all this seller's watches, probably much more wrong, but enough time spent already. edited as a disclaimer; as Roff said, I was too kind, probably much more wrong with it, but just not worth the effort; even if it sells it will be shill bidding and it will reappear soon; no sane person will buy his stuff. |
|
| Author: | Roffensian [ Fri Jun 21, 2013 5:27 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: An original 785? |
WatchFred wrote: Roffensian wrote: So why are we giving it exposure? absolutely right, Roff. google is a b*tch, poeple might actually see this thread, so now we will have to say that it is not only priced WAY above fair market, but: dial refinished w/ incorrect logo for period balance bridge incorrectly (very!) marked correctors for date/month are very strange, to put it mildly quite a poor specimen. You're being too kind........ |
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC - 8 hours |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |
|