The Breitling Watch Source Forums https://www.breitlingsource.com/phpBB2/ |
|
Top time ref 2008 https://www.breitlingsource.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?f=31&t=43565 |
Page 1 of 1 |
Author: | Grzegorzgr [ Mon Nov 05, 2012 12:30 am ] |
Post subject: | Top time ref 2008 |
Looks real to me. Looking forward for your judgement. |
Author: | WatchFred [ Mon Nov 05, 2012 12:45 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Top time ref 2008 |
absolutely real, all components seem correct; 1967 piece, Venus188/Valjoux 7730. dial and hands are in very, very nice condition. |
Author: | saabreit [ Mon Nov 05, 2012 8:08 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Top time ref 2008 |
Yes I saw this one, looks 100% genuine . Just a restriction about the the "sunburst" effect, the pics do not allow to really appreciate the condition of the case. |
Author: | WatchFred [ Mon Nov 05, 2012 8:14 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Top time ref 2008 |
not sure this is a "sunburst" case, Phil ? |
Author: | Grzegorzgr [ Mon Nov 05, 2012 9:07 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Top time ref 2008 |
Thanks guys for your opinions and yes it is sunburst effect. The dial and the case are in almost immaculate condition. Just the crystal needs to be replaced. |
Author: | WatchFred [ Tue Nov 06, 2012 2:46 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Top time ref 2008 |
sorry, but still unconvinced this is a sunburst case. below are the three case finishing versions I have seen in GP, two could be called "sunburst", neither of these seems similar to the case posted above ? ![]() |
Author: | Roffensian [ Tue Nov 06, 2012 5:22 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Top time ref 2008 |
If it is a sunburst case then it would appear to have been very excessively polished. |
Author: | WatchFred [ Tue Nov 06, 2012 5:45 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Top time ref 2008 |
Roffensian wrote: If it is a sunburst case then it would appear to have been very excessively polished. ![]() |
Author: | Roffensian [ Tue Nov 06, 2012 7:26 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Top time ref 2008 |
WatchFred wrote: Roffensian wrote: If it is a sunburst case then it would appear to have been very excessively polished. ![]() Exactly. |
Author: | saabreit [ Tue Nov 06, 2012 10:21 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Top time ref 2008 |
Roffensian wrote: WatchFred wrote: Roffensian wrote: If it is a sunburst case then it would appear to have been very excessively polished. ![]() Exactly. Yes, not enough regarding the original sunburst, but too much for scratches on a polished case . Maybe a better pic? |
Author: | Grzegorzgr [ Tue Nov 06, 2012 11:07 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Top time ref 2008 |
Sorry guys it is my fault. ![]() This is not a sunburst case. I thought you meant sun reflections. ![]() This is a glossy finished case with some scratches. Do you think it should be left like this or polished? |
Author: | Roffensian [ Tue Nov 06, 2012 11:11 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Top time ref 2008 |
Grzegorzgr wrote: Sorry guys it is my fault. ![]() This is not a sunburst case. I thought you meant sun reflections. ![]() This is a glossy finished case with some scratches. Do you think it should be left like this or polished? It's only plated, if you polish it then you'll end up with an SS case. |
Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC - 8 hours |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |