The Breitling Watch Source Forums

Breitling Watch Information Forums, Navitimer, Chronomat
It is currently Tue Apr 30, 2024 8:49 pm

All times are UTC - 8 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 5 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Apr 08, 2009 1:35 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 25, 2009 10:19 am
Posts: 6003
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 0 post
Location: Arkansas, USA
I was wondering if this ebay listing was recognized by you guys. Kind of looks like a Datora but seems questionable to me.
http://cgi.ebay.com/Vintage-Mens-Breitl ... 240%3A1318


You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Apr 08, 2009 2:12 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member

Joined: Thu Feb 12, 2009 7:23 pm
Posts: 90
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 0 post
Reference 785 Datora, serial dates to 1951, movement should be Venus 191. While I can't make out the movement number stamped in the main plate, it is a venus and matches the pictures I have. All that said, I don't believe this was manufactured under the Breitling name. The engraving on the back and chrono bridge is definitely wrong. It may have been manufactured by Breitling for another company and the engraving added later to "enhance" the value.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Apr 08, 2009 2:36 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 25, 2009 10:19 am
Posts: 6003
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 0 post
Location: Arkansas, USA
Thanks packrat. Very interesting.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Apr 08, 2009 3:48 pm 
Offline
Contributing Moderator
Contributing Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 5:09 am
Posts: 36521
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 489 posts
Location: Ontario, Canada
It is a Venus 191, picture has been taken with the chronograph running, but it's been assembled incorrectly - you can see that the chrono lever is in front of the bridge, it should be behind.

The engraving on the bridge looks wrong as Packrat says, as is the caseback. However, the biggest problem would appear to be the fact that it has a different manufacturer's name on the dial :lol:


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Apr 08, 2009 4:10 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 25, 2009 10:19 am
Posts: 6003
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 0 post
Location: Arkansas, USA
Well.....that answers that. Thanks as always Roff. You are a genius sir. :D


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 5 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 8 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 123 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
 




Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group