The Breitling Watch Source Forums https://www.breitlingsource.com/phpBB2/ |
|
1940s 769 Chronomat differences https://www.breitlingsource.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=56236 |
Page 1 of 1 |
Author: | davedc74 [ Fri Dec 05, 2014 7:23 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: 1940s 769 Chronomat differences |
The bigger issue w this watch is that there is no reference number on the case back, I think |
Author: | John90 [ Fri Dec 05, 2014 7:28 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: 1940s 769 Chronomat differences |
Yea thanks, I noticed that too, and it doesn't seem to have the breitling name on the movement or the stripes shown in part 1 of the guide on the movement without name. I'm not considering buying it, I am just wanting to learn more about the difference in dials, and this dial shows the small numbers and no arrow in one picture and was easy to hand. |
Author: | John90 [ Fri Dec 05, 2014 7:39 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: 1940s 769 Chronomat differences |
That would be great, thank you |
Author: | davedc74 [ Fri Dec 05, 2014 7:42 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: 1940s 769 Chronomat differences |
Sorry I deleted my post because I'm sure it's the same article that you refered to as the famous online guide! |
Author: | John90 [ Fri Dec 05, 2014 7:44 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: 1940s 769 Chronomat differences |
Ah ok no problem. There is another one linked in a thread on here somewhere that I saw which needs translation but I need to locate it again, I seem to have forgot to mark the page ![]() |
Author: | vintage [ Fri Dec 05, 2014 7:59 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: 1940s 769 Chronomat differences |
I looked at that one this morning and the back definitely would make me look elsewhere. |
Author: | John90 [ Fri Dec 05, 2014 8:04 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: 1940s 769 Chronomat differences |
I've found the link I was looking for, hopefully this will have some info on my questions although it looks similar to part 1 of the guide I've already viewed http://translate.googleusercontent.com/ ... UOqklwCeQA The 2nd picture in the link, an old advertisement, shows the watch without the 5-6 arrow. |
Author: | WatchFred [ Fri Dec 05, 2014 9:19 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: 1940s 769 Chronomat differences |
we see several dial variations on the very early pieces - but basically there were lume arabics dials with lume hands and non lume arabics w/ thin baton hands from the launch 1941/42 until the very late 1940s, then we see a transitional period w/ applied logo and applied baton index dials, but no "Geneve", finally "Geneve" added to these applied logo dials from 1952/53 until the end of production in 1957. the Altro article is good, but not without errors. Yes, we should write an updated one. I am less concerned w/ the missing ref. No. on that piece in the OP, that was a transitional period and reference numbers around then started to appear, case looks perfectly correct and is genuine without doubt. Mobile now, will post some dial example pics later. |
Author: | WatchFred [ Fri Dec 05, 2014 10:01 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: 1940s 769 Chronomat differences |
yes, the earliest pieces do not have that arrow. when comparing and evaluating Breitling serial numbers, be aware that these indicate case production years, final watch assembly might be years later, so we see lots of overlap and "transitions". |
Author: | WatchFred [ Fri Dec 05, 2014 10:02 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: 1940s 769 Chronomat differences |
btw. - we are not on TZ here, so invenitetfecit or wus can be openly spoken about ![]() |
Author: | John90 [ Fri Dec 05, 2014 10:04 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: 1940s 769 Chronomat differences |
Great, thanks for clarifying Fred. |
Author: | WatchFred [ Fri Dec 05, 2014 11:38 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: 1940s 769 Chronomat differences |
Suprisingly h odinkee is off limits, though and nobody seems to remember why. |
Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC - 8 hours |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |