It looks to me that the movement has had some heavy work done to it. It shouldn't say Sprint on a Cadette movement in any case. The vvvvv on the balance cock might be someones attempt to x out whatever was there originally but it's hard to tell from the pics. Notice some of the movement screws have been painted red too. All indications that something has been going on with the watch. I've seen the 1188 and 1189's without anything printed on the bridge and with Cadette printed on the bridge so I think either way is probably ok. Often the 1188's and 1189's don't even say Cadette on the dial. They made a bunch of the 11xx watches so they are constantly popping up in various stages of modification or configuration.

Thank you for your answer. No no, movement screws aren't red. This is optical illusion. They are grey, on the second Foto they are grey. This symbol on the balance cock is not damaged, it is exactly vvvvv. In service I was told that it could be on some consignment.
And what about Cadette dial and Sprint movement. I am confused too. But I found some other examples.
But maybe the dial there was replaced too. This is the link

http://uhrenshop.classic-watch-forum.de ... e-VERKAUFT

And here is the same movement as mine
http://www.ebay.de/itm/BREITLING-Uhr-Ch ... 0604586419

Movement is not accurate for a Cadette. Balance cock definitely didn't start life in a Breitling and while the bridge stamping may be Breitling it shouldn't be in a Cadette. Reference links just undermine the credibility of the piece further because of that seller's reputation.

Not at all surprised that Breitling said that it was OK, Breitling today is a totally separate company from the one that produced watches prior to 1978 and bluntly they don't have much knowledge of vintage pieces. That would be fine if they were prepared to admit that, but regrettably there is a steady stream of examples of them making erroneous claims about originality of vintage pieces.

hmmm....

I have yet to see a convincing "Sprint"-marked dial in a piece from the 1950s - happy to be proven wrong.

EXN is very interesting as it is a code attributed to Breitling US imports in the 1940s according to the Ranfft database, though the history of these is totally unknown, we never saw a documented example of these (you'll notice Ranfft puts it in italics), definitely not used after the mid 1940s (WOG/BOW/WOG from then on).

The only confirmably authentic component I see is the case itself, dated to 1950; ref. 1191 is clearly part of the "Cadette" range, though dials were rarely marked as such.

Rest is a hodgepodge of incorrect engravings, hands and dial.

This is The Fotos. The best that I cann with my Camera. maybe you saw something else.

I'll try to make a detail Foto now.