The Breitling Watch Source Forums

Breitling Watch Information Forums, Navitimer, Chronomat
It is currently Sun May 04, 2025 3:13 am

All times are UTC - 8 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 4 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Unusual 806 dial?
PostPosted: Wed Feb 25, 2015 11:20 am 
Offline
Breitling Fanatic
Breitling Fanatic
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2014 12:11 am
Posts: 274
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 43 posts
On the bay...

1965 806 with small subs but with red markers...

As way of learning more I ask Is this correct?

http://pages.ebay.com/link/?nav=item.vi ... 1601552136




Will


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Unusual 806 dial?
PostPosted: Wed Feb 25, 2015 11:31 am 
Offline
Breitling Maniac
Breitling Maniac

Joined: Fri Mar 28, 2014 1:06 pm
Posts: 1382
Likes: 239 posts
Liked in: 365 posts
Location: England
Just a 67/68 dial with the wrong sliderule, no? Maybe the receipt does not belong to the watch. Serial number would tell.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Unusual 806 dial?
PostPosted: Wed Feb 25, 2015 11:34 am 
Offline
Breitling Fanatic
Breitling Fanatic
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 04, 2014 10:06 am
Posts: 363
Likes: 22 posts
Liked in: 123 posts
I think you're asking because you wonder if it should have larger sub dials? The larger 9mm subregisters did not appear until '68 according to the handy 806 timeline. Small registers on the "box 10" dial is correct, but the slide rule should have matching red markings. Due to the patination of the dial, it's not surprising the original slide rule was likely trashed.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Unusual 806 dial?
PostPosted: Wed Feb 25, 2015 11:40 am 
Offline
Breitling Fanatic
Breitling Fanatic
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2014 12:11 am
Posts: 274
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 43 posts
Eric_navi wrote:
I think you're asking because you wonder if it should have larger sub dials? The larger 9mm subregisters did not appear until '68 according to the handy 806 timeline. Small registers on the "box 10" dial is correct, but the slide rule should have matching red markings. Due to the patination of the dial, it's not surprising the original slide rule was likely trashed.


Thanks. Yes. Just noticed the red box so would be a 1967(?) as opposed to '65?

Slide rule therefore a replacement and date incorrect....or dial replaced!

As David says serial number would resolve it.


Will


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 4 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 8 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot] and 4 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
 




Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group