The Breitling Watch Source Forums

Breitling Watch Information Forums, Navitimer, Chronomat
It is currently Mon May 05, 2025 6:37 am

All times are UTC - 8 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Jan 25, 2013 1:00 pm 
Offline
Breitling Enthusiast
Breitling Enthusiast

Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2013 12:14 pm
Posts: 22
Likes: 6 posts
Liked in: 0 post
Hello,

I have an early Chronomat for almost 20 years now. I had it serviced at a Breitling dealer a long time ago and it was before I was interested in the caliber. I knew it was a vintage Breitling of course and i loved the looks of it.
As I was 19 it failed running and I had it repaired. I was just a student and agreed to clean the watch (dial, case, mechanism) and change the plexi glass and the hands (new, now I regret it because they look too new) but keep the costs under 7000 Belgian Frank (about 170 euro).
I did not see the mechanism or asked about the serial number. Long time I thought it had serialnumber 769.

Later I started wondering about its age and started comparing it with other 769 chronomats on the net. I started spotting differences.
There was no B on the crown, there was no serial number on the back, only 769 and acier inoxydable. So I started wondering if it had been changed in its previous years. Then I saw that the older versions had the same crown and a serial number on the inside.

Recently I took it to a dealer in vintage watches, just to open the case back and to have a look inside at the serialnumber.
I took some quick photos, not a good job I'm afraid.

And again there are questions. The serial nr is predating 1944, but when.
The caliber should be a Venus175, but no markings of Breitling or Cote de Geneve deoration, is this normal?

Thanks

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image


Last edited by paca on Fri Jan 25, 2013 1:20 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Jan 25, 2013 1:08 pm 
Offline
Contributing Moderator
Contributing Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 5:09 am
Posts: 36521
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 489 posts
Location: Ontario, Canada
I am viewing on a cell phone so not necessarily seeing everything but it looks like a correct early piece. Chronomat wascintroduced in 1942 so if the serial number is too early for the table (I don't see it in the photos) then you still have a tight range. An unmarked movement is perfectly correct for these early pieces.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Jan 25, 2013 2:53 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member

Joined: Sun Jan 02, 2011 4:36 pm
Posts: 14216
Likes: 1471 posts
Liked in: 1728 posts
Location: Vienna, Austria
absolutely correct and nice early ref. 760


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 8 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
 




Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group