The Breitling Watch Source Forums

I'm trying to id this breitling. I've attached pictures of the front and back - if I remove the rear cover there are no markings. Rear markings look like side portrait, plus 18K / 0.750, 147, with 80 stamped at the bottom.

any help is appreciated!

Thanks

Kram

I need to check the books, but I am sceptical. The markings on the back are not consistent with Breitling markings, although it is correct markings for a gold case watch.

I also don't think that the dial is original, so I'm not convinced that it's a Breitling. Are there any markings on the movement (or do you have photos).

I suspect a redial too... might be a copy of a ref. 178 with the venus 170 movement...

_________________
"I don't got the bright watch I got the right watch" -Jay Z

sorry for the newbie response, but I only got the outer cover off, not sure how to remove the back...

That's definitive proof that it's not a Breitling.

If it has a double caseback it's because the gold is thin and a second caseback is needed to protect the movement. Breitling never used double casebacks on their gold watches because their gold cases were thick enough to not need it.

Sorry.

thanks anyways