The Breitling Watch Source Forums

Breitling Watch Information Forums, Navitimer, Chronomat
It is currently Sun Jun 16, 2024 9:07 am

All times are UTC - 8 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 10 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Carrier landing
PostPosted: Sat Jan 21, 2012 12:07 pm 
Offline
Breitling Fanatic
Breitling Fanatic

Joined: Tue Oct 27, 2009 7:19 am
Posts: 376
Likes: 14 posts
Liked in: 23 posts
Location: Maryland
Landing on a pitching deck.

part1
http://www.youtube.com/watch_popup?v=4gGMI8d3vLs

part2
http://www.youtube.com/watch_popup?v=S0yj70QbBzg


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Carrier landing
PostPosted: Sat Jan 21, 2012 12:22 pm 
Offline
Breitling Connoisseur
Breitling Connoisseur

Joined: Mon Dec 19, 2011 2:11 pm
Posts: 615
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 0 post
Location: U.S.A.
Anyone who knows.....Knows that Navy pilots are the best in the world.
In the old days...Many U.S. Navy pilots who "washed out" did something called.
"for the good of the service transfer" to the U.S.Army to become helicopter pilots.
They were already excellent pilots but could not land on carriers so they could not fly
in the Navy. They entered the Army as Warrant Officer Candidates and went thru with
the rest of us untrained WOC's.
Hands down any carrier pilot is the "BEST"

_________________
"In the end there can be but one"


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Carrier landing
PostPosted: Sat Jan 21, 2012 12:31 pm 
Offline
Breitling Enthusiast
Breitling Enthusiast
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2010 6:15 pm
Posts: 97
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 0 post
Location: Merica
meh... properly fuzed ordnance on target on time more important imo.

_________________
Bs: Code Yellow, SW Ti, B1
Seikos: Sumo/SBDC001, Baby Tuna/SRP231, and Big Orange/SNM037
Citizen Eco-Zilla!


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Carrier landing
PostPosted: Sat Jan 21, 2012 12:48 pm 
Offline
Breitling Fanatic
Breitling Fanatic

Joined: Tue Sep 07, 2010 9:02 pm
Posts: 147
Likes: 3 posts
Liked in: 2 posts
Twotone540 wrote:
...Many U.S. Navy pilots who "washed out" did something called.
"for the good of the service transfer" to the U.S.Army to become helicopter pilots.
They were already excellent pilots but could not land on carriers so they could not fly
in the Navy. They entered the Army as Warrant Officer Candidates and went thru with
the rest of us untrained WOC's.
Hands down any carrier pilot is the "BEST"

Sorry to contradict you, but having been around Naval Aviation for the last 35 years I do not believe this was ever the case. First, the number of helos in the Navy has always been about 50% of the total aircraft the Navy owned. Second, there are a large number of non-carrier based aircraft in the Navy, at least 15% of the remaining aircraft. Third, the vast majority of Naval Aviators are commissioned officers. If they accept transfer to the Army as a Warrant Officer, they would be direct commissioned to that rank and not attend WOC. Fourth, until the late 1990s/early 2000s, Navy officers who failed to wing were redesignated into other Navy specialties (mostly surface warfare and intell) to meet the manning in those communities who had a harder time recruiting - this wasn't a choice. Since then, a select number are able to redesignate and the rest are separated from the Navy (the percent of each varies on the Navy's needs at that time).

There used to be a program called NAVCAD in the 1960s & 1970s where non-Academy, non-ROTC and non-college graduate candidates could train to be Naval Aviators. These guys attended Aviation OCS but were not commissioned until they completed flight training and received their wings. If a NAVCAD failed to wing he was separated from the Navy. Since this was the Viet Nam war era and the Army was hurting for helo pilots, I would not be surprised if many of these guys applied to and were accepted for Army flight training. They then would have to have attended WOC. But this would not have been an interservice transfer as they would have been totally separated from military service and applying just like anyone else off the street. This might be what you are thinking about.

Now the part about Nay pilots being the best in the world? Absolutely true!

_________________
Breitling Montbrillant Olympus
Breitling Navitimer World
Breitling Chronomat
Breitling Colt GMT
Omega Seamaster GMT "Great White"
Omega Speedmaster X-33
Rolex GMT Master IIc
Bremont ALT1-ZT


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Carrier landing
PostPosted: Sat Jan 21, 2012 12:59 pm 
Offline
Breitling Connoisseur
Breitling Connoisseur

Joined: Mon Dec 19, 2011 2:11 pm
Posts: 615
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 0 post
Location: U.S.A.
jerhal wrote:
Twotone540 wrote:
...Many U.S. Navy pilots who "washed out" did something called.
"for the good of the service transfer" to the U.S.Army to become helicopter pilots.
They were already excellent pilots but could not land on carriers so they could not fly
in the Navy. They entered the Army as Warrant Officer Candidates and went thru with
the rest of us untrained WOC's.
Hands down any carrier pilot is the "BEST"

Sorry to contradict you, but having been around Naval Aviation for the last 35 years I do not believe this was ever the case. First, the number of helos in the Navy has always been about 50% of the total aircraft the Navy owned. Second, there are a large number of non-carrier based aircraft in the Navy, at least 15% of the remaining aircraft. Third, the vast majority of Naval Aviators are commissioned officers. If they accept transfer to the Army as a Warrant Officer, they would be direct commissioned to that rank and not attend WOC. Fourth, until the late 1990s/early 2000s, Navy officers who failed to wing were redesignated into other Navy specialties (mostly surface warfare and intell) to meet the manning in those communities who had a harder time recruiting - this wasn't a choice. Since then, a select number are able to redesignate and the rest are separated from the Navy (the percent of each varies on the Navy's needs at that time).

There used to be a program called NAVCAD in the 1960s & 1970s where non-Academy, non-ROTC and non-college graduate candidates could train to be Naval Aviators. These guys attended Aviation OCS but were not commissioned until they completed flight training and received their wings. If a NAVCAD failed to wing he was separated from the Navy. Since this was the Viet Nam war era and the Army was hurting for helo pilots, I would not be surprised if many of these guys applied to and were accepted for Army flight training. They then would have to have attended WOC. But this would not have been an interservice transfer as they would have been totally separated from military service and applying just like anyone else off the street. This might be what you are thinking about.

Now the part about Nay pilots being the best in the world? Absolutely true!

Maybe...But they never went to Army Basic Training...One day Navy..Next day orders to Army Flt. School.I had 5or 6 in my class.
W.O.C. class 68-01

_________________
"In the end there can be but one"


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Carrier landing
PostPosted: Mon Jan 23, 2012 12:18 am 
Offline
Cult of Breitling Leader
Cult of Breitling Leader
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2010 7:38 am
Posts: 3169
Likes: 10 posts
Liked in: 4 posts
Location: La Tour-de-Peilz, Switzerland
Twotone540 wrote:
Hands down any carrier pilot is the "BEST"


:yeahthat

+1

_________________
Image

- This is Ghost Rider requesting a fly-by. - Negative Ghost Rider. The pattern is full.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Carrier landing
PostPosted: Mon Jan 23, 2012 1:44 am 
Offline
All Roads lead to Breitling
All Roads lead to Breitling
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2007 8:23 am
Posts: 9766
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 1 post
Location: Republik of Mancunia, UK
Content is blocked in the UK. :(

_________________
Image
For more information on identifying Breitling replicas, please visit my web site
http://f4buz.com/watches/breitling/fakes/fakes.html


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Carrier landing
PostPosted: Mon Jan 23, 2012 2:04 am 
Offline
Cult of Breitling Leader
Cult of Breitling Leader
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2010 7:38 am
Posts: 3169
Likes: 10 posts
Liked in: 4 posts
Location: La Tour-de-Peilz, Switzerland
Sharkmouth wrote:
Content is blocked in the UK. :(


In Switzerland as well but they are still the best. :mrgreen:

_________________
Image

- This is Ghost Rider requesting a fly-by. - Negative Ghost Rider. The pattern is full.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Carrier landing
PostPosted: Mon Jan 23, 2012 9:07 am 
Offline
Breitling Enthusiast
Breitling Enthusiast

Joined: Sun Jan 08, 2012 10:56 pm
Posts: 62
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 0 post
Sharkmouth wrote:
Content is blocked in the UK. :(


+1 in Japan :roll:


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Carrier landing
PostPosted: Mon Jan 23, 2012 2:17 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 3:26 am
Posts: 2241
Likes: 7 posts
Liked in: 24 posts
Location: Ireland
julks wrote:
Sharkmouth wrote:
Content is blocked in the UK. :(


+1 in Japan :roll:

YouTube landing on a pitching deal. Part 1 and part 2. Quite impressive.

_________________
Breanach78

A Few Breitlings.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 10 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 8 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 20 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
 




Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group