The Breitling Watch Source Forums

Breitling Watch Information Forums, Navitimer, Chronomat
It is currently Wed May 07, 2025 6:34 am

All times are UTC - 8 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 13 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Aerospace Question
PostPosted: Mon Feb 09, 2009 1:07 pm 
Offline
Breitling Fanatic
Breitling Fanatic

Joined: Mon Feb 02, 2009 4:58 pm
Posts: 312
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 0 post
I was reading the technical data about the Aerospace Watch on Breitling.com and it said under calender that the day and date were programmed for 4 years. So after 4 years, what happens? Can you get it reprogrammed?

Thanks,
cRaSiAn1030


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Aerospace Question
PostPosted: Mon Feb 09, 2009 1:57 pm 
Offline
Wild Ling, You Make my Heart Sing!
Wild Ling, You Make my Heart Sing!
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 11, 2008 12:27 pm
Posts: 4302
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 0 post
Location: Los Angeles
Yes. Its just telling you that programming is only needed every 4 years.

_________________
-RJ


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Aerospace Question
PostPosted: Wed Feb 11, 2009 6:23 am 
Offline
Breitling Enthusiast
Breitling Enthusiast

Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2008 9:14 pm
Posts: 62
Likes: 1 post
Liked in: 2 posts
Location: BC, Canada
Just to be clear, every leap year, you will have to manually correct the date.

I got mine in the summer last year, so wait until Feb 29, 2012 and I'll report back what I had to do.

_________________
There are three kinds of people in this world; those that can count and those that can't.

1 - Aerospace blue dial
2 - ?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Aerospace Question
PostPosted: Wed Feb 11, 2009 12:17 pm 
Offline
Breitling Enthusiast
Breitling Enthusiast

Joined: Sun Jan 04, 2009 1:33 pm
Posts: 18
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 0 post
Leap years cannot be programmed easily. There is a leap year every four years, but not if it is a even 100 year. But then again; it is leap year if it is an even 400 years. There was leap years at 1996, 2000 and 2004, but at the turn of next century there will be leap years 2096 and then 2104 (common year 2100)

This cannot easily be "programmed" into a mechanical clock and my guess is that it is not worth doing it in a digital. So they go with the easier algorithm; there are no leap years (actually 28:th of Feb always is followed by 1:st of March).

So every time there is a 29:th of February (always a Tuesday for century leap years) your Aerospace will display 1:st of March and you need to correct it (twice).

Hope I got it right, it's easier to express in program code ;-)

_________________
Segal's law — "A man with a watch knows what time it is. A man with two watches is never sure."


Last edited by joma on Wed Feb 11, 2009 12:50 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Aerospace Question
PostPosted: Wed Feb 11, 2009 12:41 pm 
Offline
Contributing Moderator
Contributing Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 5:09 am
Posts: 36521
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 489 posts
Location: Ontario, Canada
joma wrote:
Leap years cannot be programmed easily. There is a leap year every four years, but not if it is a even 100 year. But then again; it is leap year if it is an even 400 years. There was leap years at 1996, 2000 and 2004, but at the turn of next century there will be leap years 2096 and then 2104 (common year 2100)

This cannot easily be "programmed" into a mechanical clock and my guess is that it is not worth doing it in a digital. So they go with the easier algorithm; there are no leap years (actually 28:th of Feb always is followed by 1:st of March).

So every time there is a 29:th of February (always a Tuesday btw) your Aerospace will display 1:st of March and you need to correct it (twice).

Hope I got it right, it's easier to express in program code ;-)


Mechanical perpetual watches ignore the 100 year rule - they alwasy assume that every 4th year has a February 29th.

Incidentally, February 29th 2008 was a Friday!


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Aerospace Question
PostPosted: Wed Feb 11, 2009 12:52 pm 
Offline
Breitling Enthusiast
Breitling Enthusiast

Joined: Sun Jan 04, 2009 1:33 pm
Posts: 18
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 0 post
Corrected (only goes for CLYs of course)

_________________
Segal's law — "A man with a watch knows what time it is. A man with two watches is never sure."


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Aerospace Question
PostPosted: Wed Feb 11, 2009 12:59 pm 
Offline
Breitling Enthusiast
Breitling Enthusiast

Joined: Sun Jan 04, 2009 1:33 pm
Posts: 18
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 0 post
Just checked up the words that was used on the Breitling web. It says:

Calendar: Digital, day and date programmed for 4 years

Maybe they mean: programmed for 4 years rule, but not 100 and 400 years rule? and the Aerospace actually does keep track of the 29:th?

_________________
Segal's law — "A man with a watch knows what time it is. A man with two watches is never sure."


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Aerospace Question
PostPosted: Wed Feb 11, 2009 1:27 pm 
Offline
Contributing Moderator
Contributing Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 5:09 am
Posts: 36521
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 489 posts
Location: Ontario, Canada
joma wrote:
Just checked up the words that was used on the Breitling web. It says:

Calendar: Digital, day and date programmed for 4 years

Maybe they mean: programmed for 4 years rule, but not 100 and 400 years rule? and the Aerospace actually does keep track of the 29:th?


It doesn't.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Aerospace Question
PostPosted: Wed Feb 11, 2009 1:37 pm 
Offline
Breitling Enthusiast
Breitling Enthusiast

Joined: Sun Jan 04, 2009 1:33 pm
Posts: 18
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 0 post
Roffensian wrote:
It doesn't.


I'm sure you're right, but it makes very little sense imo. It should be much simpler doing more advanced algorithms with electronics than with mechanics. Otherwise we would celebrate Charles Babbage rather than Alan Turing ;-)

_________________
Segal's law — "A man with a watch knows what time it is. A man with two watches is never sure."


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Aerospace Question
PostPosted: Wed Feb 11, 2009 4:15 pm 
Offline
Wild Ling, You Make my Heart Sing!
Wild Ling, You Make my Heart Sing!
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 11, 2008 12:27 pm
Posts: 4302
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 0 post
Location: Los Angeles
joma wrote:
Roffensian wrote:
It doesn't.


I'm sure you're right, but it makes very little sense imo. It should be much simpler doing more advanced algorithms with electronics than with mechanics. Otherwise we would celebrate Charles Babbage rather than Alan Turing ;-)


Probably easier, but keep in mind that swiss perpetuals start at ~$25k.

_________________
-RJ


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Aerospace Question
PostPosted: Wed Feb 11, 2009 5:37 pm 
Offline
Contributing Moderator
Contributing Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 5:09 am
Posts: 36521
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 489 posts
Location: Ontario, Canada
Also remember that Breitling aren't trying to make every watch the same.

Is it relatively easy to make every quartz watch a perpetual minute repeater - sure, but they won't do it because they are trying to differentiate their models.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Aerospace Question
PostPosted: Wed Feb 11, 2009 5:41 pm 
Offline
Breitling Fanatic
Breitling Fanatic

Joined: Sun Jan 25, 2009 6:27 pm
Posts: 493
Likes: 40 posts
Liked in: 49 posts
What Breitling models are automatic perpetuals?

_________________
Current collection: Breitling Superocean Heritage I 46, Rolex Submariner, Swatch X ****** Sistem51


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Aerospace Question
PostPosted: Wed Feb 11, 2009 5:44 pm 
Offline
Contributing Moderator
Contributing Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 5:09 am
Posts: 36521
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 489 posts
Location: Ontario, Canada
mwheatley wrote:
What Breitling models are automatic perpetuals?


Currently only the Bentley Mark VI Complications 29.

Of the recent models there has also been the Mulliner Perpetual and several LE Navitimers.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 13 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 8 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 67 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
 




Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group