The Breitling Watch Source Forums

Breitling Watch Information Forums, Navitimer, Chronomat
It is currently Tue May 06, 2025 12:50 am

All times are UTC - 8 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 4 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun Nov 09, 2008 6:52 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2007 6:35 pm
Posts: 1269
Likes: 2 posts
Liked in: 1 post
Location: Vancouver BC Canada
Had my first look at the new Seawolf - in the flesh - today. I had gone back to La Swiss in Vancouver, because they had an older titanium model in the showcase yesterday that I wanted to see and get the price on. It was $2700CAD with black dial and Diver Pro strap, not bad as that is the price before the 16% increase.
Also on display was a brand new Seawolf - black dial with stainless steel PROII, for 3660CAD. I was absolutely in awe: from the pictures, I really didn't care for it, the triangular marker, the large rectangular markers etc I thought it looked to "busy". Well, when I saw it for real, I actually thought it all worked very well. That watch really has a presence, especially with the Skyland-type stencilled numerals.
According to the Breitling website, it is 44mm, which is the same as my Steelfish. The older model is just over 18mm thick, about the same as the SA. However, to me this really seemed a lot larger than my Steelfish, and of course even thicker than my Blacksteel. The bracelet seemed to me immense, but I believe the lug width is only 22mm and not 24mm. Unfortunately, the Breitling website only gives the diameter of the new one, and neither the thickness nor lug width. Anybody know for sure?
Anyway, once again it proves that you have to see the real thing without relying on pictures, however good they may be.
Cheers,
Carl

_________________
'63 Omega Seamaster, 2014 Omega Speedmaster MarkII
Image
"Those who possess a sense of entitlement are seldom satisfied"


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Nov 09, 2008 7:10 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2007 6:35 pm
Posts: 1269
Likes: 2 posts
Liked in: 1 post
Location: Vancouver BC Canada
Funny thing, after the above post I had a look on the Japan Website. I don't speak Japanese, but they had two numbers 45.40/18.40 which I assume are diameter and thickness. I couldn't see anything that said either 22 or 24, which would be the lug width. I suppose, with 45.40mm diameter, it could be 24mm. Funny that the English website would state 44.00mm as the diameter, and if you actually hold the watch it does seem bigger. That would put it at just a bit bigger than the AS.
Cheers,
Carl

_________________
'63 Omega Seamaster, 2014 Omega Speedmaster MarkII
Image
"Those who possess a sense of entitlement are seldom satisfied"


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Nov 09, 2008 9:40 pm 
Offline
Wild Ling, You Make my Heart Sing!
Wild Ling, You Make my Heart Sing!
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 11, 2008 12:27 pm
Posts: 4302
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 0 post
Location: Los Angeles
I saw the new specs, and apparently the skyland is also measured to be 45.4 now. I guess its the same case for the skyland and the seawolf, sans pusher holes.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Nov 10, 2008 1:22 am 
Offline
Contributing Moderator
Contributing Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 24, 2007 11:39 am
Posts: 12837
Likes: 148 posts
Liked in: 520 posts
Location: UK
Lug width is 22mm.

_________________
Driver8

Site Moderator
Image


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 4 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 8 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 42 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
 




Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group