| The Breitling Watch Source Forums https://www.breitlingsource.com/phpBB2/ |
|
| Breitling Avenger Skyland https://www.breitlingsource.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=51078 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | Granox [ Tue Dec 03, 2013 3:56 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Breitling Avenger Skyland |
Can someone tell me if the Avenger Skyland is inhouse manufactured or not. I have been told two conflicting stories. One, that it was the first model to be manufactured inhouse and the second, that it will be made inhouse in the future as they are bringing all their models inhouse. |
|
| Author: | Roffensian [ Tue Dec 03, 2013 4:29 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Breitling Avenger Skyland |
It's not, it's ETA Valjoux 7750 based. The Chronomat 01 was the first model with an in house movement |
|
| Author: | Granox [ Tue Dec 03, 2013 6:28 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Breitling Avenger Skyland |
Just wondering Does it make any difference inhouse or not are there any advantages one way or the other? Does inhouse make it a better watch or more desirable? I'm just trying to understand this.. who else does the company that makes the movements manufacture for. Please excuse my ignorance. |
|
| Author: | Roffensian [ Wed Dec 04, 2013 4:48 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Breitling Avenger Skyland |
There are a heck of a lot of topics on this so search will help you out. ETA is the largest movement manufacturer in the world and produces the vast majority of Swiss mechanical movements. Their movements are used by the likes of Breitling and IWC as well as by the no name brands that sell watches for a few hundred bucks. In the last few years more companies have been developing their own in house movements, in part because Swatch Group that owns ETA is cutting supply to outside producers, and that is what led Breitling to launch its in house movement in 2009. In house movements often have more features than generic movements - in Breitling's case a longer power reserve, instant date change and different (some would argue better) mechanism for activating the chronograph. With better in house control an in house movement should also be built to tighter tolerances and higher quality standards. However, as Breitling found out it can also have a number of teething problems and the watches with in house movements are more expensive to buy and service. Which is 'better' is a purely subjective decision for each buyer. |
|
| Author: | Driver8 [ Wed Dec 04, 2013 6:58 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Breitling Avenger Skyland |
As Roff said, there are loads of threads on here (and elsewhere) that talk about in-house movements and why people choose (or don't choose) in-house over "non-in-house". Below is a (MASSIVE) post of my own musings on the topic from 3 years ago. I've not managed to move my whole collection over to in-house as I intended to do in that thread, but my thoughts on the subject haven't really changed - viewtopic.php?f=6&t=19932 |
|
| Author: | Granox [ Wed Dec 04, 2013 1:44 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Breitling Avenger Skyland |
I went to your previous posting Driver and read all. Very interesting and it was the way I was thinking when I asked my original question. Thanks and also thanks to Roff |
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC - 8 hours |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |
|