The Breitling Watch Source Forums https://www.breitlingsource.com/phpBB2/ |
|
Greatest Breitling - Semi-finals https://www.breitlingsource.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=42734 |
Page 1 of 3 |
Author: | Roffensian [ Sat Sep 22, 2012 6:42 am ] |
Post subject: | Greatest Breitling - Semi-finals |
Semi-finals will start later today, but before that gets going I wanted to check in with you guys on my thinking for the rest of the tournament. I'm thinking that the final four should end up being listed 1 through 4 so what I would do is: 1) Regular voting for the semi-finals - 1 week head to head 2) Have a final and a 3rd / 4th play off with the two semi-final winners in hte final and the two semi-final losers in the 3rd / 4th match up. I am also thinking that the 3rd / 4th match up could be a regular 1 week vote but that the final could be 2 weeks to give more time for votes. Not sure about that as voting does seem to tail off after the first few days. What do you guys think? |
Author: | Sooner [ Sat Sep 22, 2012 7:07 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Greatest Breitling - Semi-finals |
Roffensian wrote: Have . . . the two semi-final losers in the 3rd / 4th match up. What do you guys think? A consolation game? I like it. |
Author: | Sooner [ Sat Sep 22, 2012 7:16 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Greatest Breitling - Semi-finals |
I also think the final four should be seeded, with the two higher vote-getters from the last round pitted against the two lower vote-getters, in a 1 vs. 4 and 2 vs. 3 scenario. That would mean: 1) Chronomat 13352 (49 votes) vs. 4) Crosswind Special LE (36 votes) and 2) Navitimer 01 (44 votes) vs. 3) Navitimer 1461 LE (2011) 19370 (41 votes) |
Author: | sharkman [ Sat Sep 22, 2012 8:34 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Greatest Breitling - Semi-finals |
Sooner wrote: I also think the final four should be seeded, with the two higher vote-getters from the last round pitted against the two lower vote-getters, in a 1 vs. 4 and 2 vs. 3 scenario. That would mean: 1) Chronomat 13352 (49 votes) vs. 4) Crosswind Special LE (36 votes) and 2) Navitimer 01 (44 votes) vs. 3) Navitimer 1461 LE (2011) 19370 (41 votes) I think that would be a good way to match it up, though it has been random draw throughout. But maybe a little tweaking at the final 4 stage is a good idea. Roff and the rest, what do you think? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Author: | Roffensian [ Sat Sep 22, 2012 8:37 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Greatest Breitling - Semi-finals |
sharkman wrote: Sooner wrote: I also think the final four should be seeded, with the two higher vote-getters from the last round pitted against the two lower vote-getters, in a 1 vs. 4 and 2 vs. 3 scenario. That would mean: 1) Chronomat 13352 (49 votes) vs. 4) Crosswind Special LE (36 votes) and 2) Navitimer 01 (44 votes) vs. 3) Navitimer 1461 LE (2011) 19370 (41 votes) I think that would be a good way to match it up, though it has been random draw throughout. But maybe a little tweaking at the final 4 stage is a good idea. Roff and the rest, what do you think? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk I'm not keen to be honest, simply because we had a community vote that ran for several days on the approach that should be taken and random won by a mile. I don't think that it's fair to change that at the last minute - although it's a fine idea for the 2013 version ![]() |
Author: | sharkman [ Sat Sep 22, 2012 9:17 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Greatest Breitling - Semi-finals |
That's what I thought. On with the game! Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Author: | Sooner [ Sat Sep 22, 2012 10:40 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Greatest Breitling - Semi-finals |
Roffensian wrote: we had a community vote that ran for several days on the approach that should be taken and random won by a mile. I don't think that it's fair to change that at the last minute - although it's a fine idea for the 2013 version ![]() I voted for random too, but in hindsight I think seeding would have been a better way to go, for the same reason it makes sense in sports tournaments, and should be considered if this poll is done again next year. By the way, I wasn't suggesting seeding for the semi-finals to benefit a personal favorite. Since the 'Fish fell by the wayside, I don't have a horse in this race. ![]() |
Author: | Driver8 [ Sat Sep 22, 2012 2:40 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Greatest Breitling - Semi-finals |
I say keep it random. It started random, so let's let it finish that way. ![]() |
Author: | Roffensian [ Sat Sep 22, 2012 2:51 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Greatest Breitling - Semi-finals |
Semi-Finals are up: Crosswind Special LE vs. Navitimer 1461 LE Navitimer 01 vs. Chronomat 13352 viewforum.php?f=25 Still interested in thoughts on the length of time that the final should run for. |
Author: | sharkman [ Sat Sep 22, 2012 3:22 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Greatest Breitling - Semi-finals |
Roffensian wrote: Semi-Finals are up: Crosswind Special LE vs. Navitimer 1461 LE Navitimer 02 vs. Chronomat 13352 viewforum.php?f=25 Noooooooooo. Leave it up for 3 weeks because that is how long it will take for me to choose between the Chronomat 13352 and Navi 01. My worst possible choice. Edit - oh yeah, thanks for the effort again. ![]() Edit again - to save myself the mental anguish ![]() |
Author: | sharkman [ Sat Sep 22, 2012 3:32 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Greatest Breitling - Semi-finals |
Roffensian wrote: Semi-Finals are up: Still interested in thoughts on the length of time that the final should run for. A week - the voting peters out before a week is up - Maybe next Sunday instead of Saturday? And picture IDs for the final vote. ![]() |
Author: | wessa [ Sat Sep 22, 2012 4:31 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Greatest Breitling - Semi-finals |
Oh man, choosing between the Navi 01 and 13352 is like trying to decide which arm to chop off, the left or the right one ![]() Not that I own the 13352 but its darn close to the 13050s in my collection. Looks like it could be all Navis final, bit boring. |
Author: | sharkman [ Sat Sep 22, 2012 5:30 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Greatest Breitling - Semi-finals |
wessa wrote: Oh man, choosing between the Navi 01 and 13352 is like trying to decide which arm to chop off, the left or the right one ![]() Not that I own the 13352 but its darn close to the 13050s in my collection. Looks like it could be all Navis final, bit boring. I won't say how I voted but I am wearing the one I didn't vote for. Were I Jewish, I would be sitting shiva. [i think I am getting far too vested in this forum project ![]() Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Author: | wessa [ Sun Sep 23, 2012 12:01 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Greatest Breitling - Semi-finals |
Done my voting but that was as pleasant as my visit to a dentist yesterday ![]() It's not heading my way. |
Author: | bozman52 [ Sun Sep 23, 2012 9:34 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Greatest Breitling - Semi-finals |
I find it odd that an LE of 250 Crosswind made it this far. Not exactly one of Breitling's better creations IMO. |
Page 1 of 3 | All times are UTC - 8 hours |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |