The Breitling Watch Source Forums

Breitling Watch Information Forums, Navitimer, Chronomat
It is currently Mon May 05, 2025 10:35 am

All times are UTC - 8 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 5 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun Aug 03, 2008 1:21 pm 
Offline
Breitling Newbie
Breitling Newbie

Joined: Sun Aug 03, 2008 1:18 pm
Posts: 5
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 0 post
Location: Ocala, Florida
B-1 Case Size Chronolog Discrepancy?

The 2001 Chronolog (pg 127) calls the diameter of the B-1 at 41.5 mm. The 2002 Chronolog (pg 33) calls the diameter of the B-1 at 43.2 mm. Which one is right? Or is there a case diameter difference between newer and later B-1 models?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Aug 04, 2008 3:10 am 
Offline
All Roads lead to Breitling
All Roads lead to Breitling
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2007 8:23 am
Posts: 9766
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 1 post
Location: Republik of Mancunia, UK
The 2002 Chronolog lists case diameters that do not match the pre-2002 Chronologs. While the physical size of the watches did not change, Breitling's measurement method did.

Prior to 2002, the listed case size included the 2 o'clock start/stop chronograph pusher. For 2002, it does not. Thus, a Chronomat with a listed case diameter of 41.50 mm in 2001 is now listed at 39.00 mm.

Copy/paste from the Unoffical Breitling FAQ


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Aug 04, 2008 5:36 am 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member

Joined: Thu Sep 27, 2007 11:48 pm
Posts: 3806
Likes: 11 posts
Liked in: 19 posts
Location: Sweden
But for that to be correct, possibly Guy switched the numbers for 2001 and 2002?

_________________
Collection: http://s540.photobucket.com/albums/gg32 ... mview=grid


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Aug 04, 2008 8:18 am 
Offline
Wild Ling, You Make my Heart Sing!
Wild Ling, You Make my Heart Sing!
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 11, 2008 12:27 pm
Posts: 4302
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 0 post
Location: Los Angeles
aleister wrote:
But for that to be correct, possibly Guy switched the numbers for 2001 and 2002?


Or the FAQ did :)


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Aug 05, 2008 1:14 am 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member

Joined: Thu Sep 27, 2007 11:48 pm
Posts: 3806
Likes: 11 posts
Liked in: 19 posts
Location: Sweden
Ah. :)

_________________
Collection: http://s540.photobucket.com/albums/gg32 ... mview=grid


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 5 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 8 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 48 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
 




Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group