The Breitling Watch Source Forums https://www.breitlingsource.com/phpBB2/ |
|
New Colts: Not horrible after all https://www.breitlingsource.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=36367 |
Page 1 of 3 |
Author: | WatchFred [ Thu Jan 12, 2012 4:51 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: New Colts: Not horrible after all |
sorry, but the verdict stands. even worse in the metal, quite grotesque; the rehaut is much too high for a watch of this size, it must look a steel wart on a slim wrist, I will not go into what the totally disproportionate crown reminds me of; personal opinion and tastes only, of course. |
Author: | Roffensian [ Thu Jan 12, 2012 5:12 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: New Colts: Not horrible after all |
Yeah, I'm with Fred. Crown from the parts bin rather than producing one that suits the watch, a bezel that's way too big on a 33mm watch, a very deep rehaut and consequently high case, and yet again a failure to meet dive watch standards (no lume on the second hand). That's without mentioning turning their back on a mechanical movement. |
Author: | Driver8 [ Thu Jan 12, 2012 5:14 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: New Colts: Not horrible after all |
WatchFred wrote: sorry, but the verdict stands. even worse in the metal, quite grotesque; the rehaut is much too high for a watch of this size, it must look look a steel wart on a slim wrist, I will not go into what the totally disproportionate crown reminds me of; personal opinion and tastes only, of course. ![]() Sorry Ricardo, but I totally and utterly concur with Fred on this one. I saw them in the flesh/metal at my AD a few weeks ago, and they're bl**dy HIDEOUS IMO - especially the wibbly-wobbly bezel/case side. Quite possibly the worst thing Breitling have made.... ever..... and as you can imagine it's up against some pretty stiff competition for that particular "accolade" amongst the generally hideous offerings Breitling currently have in their collection. |
Author: | WatchFred [ Thu Jan 12, 2012 5:18 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: New Colts: Not horrible after all |
Driver8 wrote: WatchFred wrote: sorry, but the verdict stands. even worse in the metal, quite grotesque; the rehaut is much too high for a watch of this size, it must look look a steel wart on a slim wrist, I will not go into what the totally disproportionate crown reminds me of; personal opinion and tastes only, of course. ![]() Sorry Ricardo, but I totally and utterly concur with Fred on this one. I saw them in the flesh/metal at my AD a few weeks ago, and they're bl**dy HIDEOUS IMO - especially the wibbly-wobbly bezel/case side. Quite possibly the worst thing Breitling have made.... ever..... and as you can imagine it's up against some pretty stiff competition for that particular "accolade" amongst the generally hideous offerings Breitling currently have in their collection. just wanted to edit my post to quote you from the last thread: viewtopic.php?f=1&t=32365&p=238500&hilit=yak#p238500 "This particular one appears to have been designed by a 3 month old chimp from his tree house in Peru, after having recently seen a 1980's Tag. The design was then apparently initially approved by a yak herder sitting in a tent in Mongolia, before finally being signed off for production by a one-eyed North Sea cod named Hank, who was found wintering in a fjord in Sweden. It would explain a lot" Hank was blind, not one-eyed. |
Author: | Driver8 [ Thu Jan 12, 2012 5:22 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: New Colts: Not horrible after all |
WatchFred wrote: Driver8 wrote: WatchFred wrote: sorry, but the verdict stands. even worse in the metal, quite grotesque; the rehaut is much too high for a watch of this size, it must look look a steel wart on a slim wrist, I will not go into what the totally disproportionate crown reminds me of; personal opinion and tastes only, of course. ![]() Sorry Ricardo, but I totally and utterly concur with Fred on this one. I saw them in the flesh/metal at my AD a few weeks ago, and they're bl**dy HIDEOUS IMO - especially the wibbly-wobbly bezel/case side. Quite possibly the worst thing Breitling have made.... ever..... and as you can imagine it's up against some pretty stiff competition for that particular "accolade" amongst the generally hideous offerings Breitling currently have in their collection. just wanted to edit my post to quote you from the last thread: viewtopic.php?f=1&t=32365&p=238500&hilit=yak#p238500 "This particular one appears to have been designed by a 3 month old chimp from his tree house in Peru, after having recently seen a 1980's Tag. The design was then apparently initially approved by a yak herder sitting in a tent in Mongolia, before finally being signed off for production by a one-eyed North Sea cod named Hank, who was found wintering in a fjord in Sweden. It would explain a lot" Hank was blind, not one-eyed. ![]() |
Author: | Roffensian [ Thu Jan 12, 2012 5:24 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: New Colts: Not horrible after all |
I just noticed that the box around the date window isn't finished either, now looks like the letter C using that font. I know that some of us have been bemoaning recent design decisions, but by 'eck this is a weird looking watch - no idea how Breitling thinks that this is going to advance sales. |
Author: | Driver8 [ Thu Jan 12, 2012 5:58 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: New Colts: Not horrible after all |
Roffensian wrote: I know that some of us have been bemoaning recent design decisions, but by 'eck this is a weird looking watch - no idea how Breitling thinks that this is going to advance sales. Quite! And it's all the more bizarre considering how Breilting can still make some incredibly beautiful, handsome and classic pieces like the Transocean Chronograph and the Navitimer 01. Just odd how their design team(S) seem to work in complete isolation from each other. |
Author: | Twotone540 [ Thu Jan 12, 2012 6:04 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: New Colts: Not horrible after all |
This is a joke...Right? Now show the reeeaal watch. |
Author: | Acro-Pilot [ Thu Jan 12, 2012 7:50 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: New Colts: Not horrible after all |
Wow... Maybe it's the silver/white dial on my wife's Colt 33 but hers doesn't hit me in a negative way like this one does. This one seems clunky and rough where her 33 doesn't feel that way at all. I posted a pic of hers in the Ladies forum. |
Author: | Acro-Pilot [ Thu Jan 12, 2012 7:56 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: New Colts: Not horrible after all |
![]() Here is my wife's Colt 33. It feels totally different to me that the one pictured at the top of this thread. |
Author: | H2F [ Thu Jan 12, 2012 8:20 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: New Colts: Not horrible after all |
It's probably the camera used. The black seemed to be taken up close with a wide-angle which exagerates the large bezel, while your white one is taken at arm's length for a much more natural angle. The white and lighting also makes the rehaut less 'vertical'. |
Author: | Sooner [ Thu Jan 12, 2012 9:20 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: New Colts: Not horrible after all |
It's fair to say the white dial is a considerable improvement over the black. I still don't get the radiant lines in the upper right and lower left quadrants. Why not either do the whole dial that way, or none at all? ![]() |
Author: | 46crew [ Thu Jan 12, 2012 9:26 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: New Colts: Not horrible after all |
I saw the new 44mm chrono at my AD, and actually liked it more than I thought. The bracelet is slightly different than previous Breitlings, and it looks pretty good. Superquartz accuracy is a favorite of mine, and for the $$ this is a good, solid, piece. I'm in the minority here, but it's a pretty good lookin' watch in my opinion. |
Author: | wrangler [ Thu Jan 12, 2012 9:53 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: New Colts: Not horrible after all |
I don't care for the depth, bezel, crown, date window, or the 6, 9, 12. |
Page 1 of 3 | All times are UTC - 8 hours |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |