The Breitling Watch Source Forums

The "they" refers to Breitling, not the Navis.

Yes but I'm not following why Breitling lost him on the Navis?

_________________
"I don't own any watches, I just lease them"

Yes but I'm not following why Breitling lost him on the Navis?[/quote]

He said but (or except) for the navis, Breitling lost him.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

_________________
Regards,

Peter

BREITLING for Bentley Motors T & Mark VI, Aerospace
ROLEX Submariner Ceramic116610LN
OMEGA Plantet Ocean 8500 42mm Orange arabics
OCEAN7 LM-3

Yes but I'm not following why Breitling lost him on the Navis?[/quote]

Sharky just said "but for the Navis, they ( Breitling) has lost me."

So everything but the navi line is any good.

_________________
“The only reason for time is so that everything doesn't happen at once.” - Albert Einstein

"But for the Navis" = "Except for the Navis"

Ahhhh thanks for clarifying Pete. Been a long week, my brain is fried. Now I see how I read it wrong, I was shocked because I know how much Tom enjoys the navi B01.

Let's just pretend the last 5 posts don't exist. I may deserve a facepalm but let's not go there.

_________________
"I don't own any watches, I just lease them"

That'll be nice. As soon as they change the font. The B01 is enough for me. If Breitling does all of the above I might just have to change my mind on a Submariner as my diver.

_________________
"I don't got the bright watch I got the right watch" -Jay Z

The PO 42 is a bit too small, the 45 is a bit too big, if Breitling created a 44mm SO, with a three hand in house movement, ceramic bezel with divers pearl, and a brushed case and brushed bracelet it would be a HUGE seller. The dial should either be all batons, or numerals like the current abyss; the current SO 44 dial is unbalanced IMO. And I want the tip of the seconds hand to be Breitling yellow. give me a clasp that's easily adjustable like the OR clasp and I'll pay whatever they want for one.

_________________
"I don't own any watches, I just lease them"

I'm sorry I asked.

"Cause-in-fact is determined by the "but for" test: but for the action, the result would not have happened. For example, but for running the red light, the collision would not have occurred. For an act to cause a harm, both tests must be met; proximate cause is a legal limitation on cause-in-fact."

But for my trial paralegal's head being buried up her a## all day, I might have had the presence of mind to type "Except."


But for Breitling's breach of the standard of design decorum, I would still give a darn about the brand. Actually I do, but older models only.

Or, in Latin, et tu Breitling.

_________________
SHARKMAN

Sounds like you need a long weekend away from everything! Almost there

_________________
Collection under construction

Congrats Roff, I have appreciated your knowledge and experience and thank you for your time and effort. I agree with some of your rant and understand where you are coming from with the rest but as a younger generation watch collector, and a SuperOcean Abyss owner I love my rubber straps and bezel cover. I am the new school watch owner, and hopefully they will have lines that both of us will love to own!!! I hope your not in line buying a watch from the "other" company right now.....


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

_________________
SuperOcean Abyss Silver

scanned through the last few posts and then had to do a double take.

Totally misread it as "except for the nazi's"!