The Breitling Watch Source Forums

Breitling Watch Information Forums, Navitimer, Chronomat
It is currently Wed May 07, 2025 9:26 am

All times are UTC - 8 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 5 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun Dec 29, 2013 11:17 am 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member

Joined: Fri Oct 09, 2009 8:58 am
Posts: 3171
Likes: 294 posts
Liked in: 534 posts
Location: Santa Marta colombia on our way to french polynesia
Guys , I always thought that Breitling changed their ref's , from A13050 to A13350 etc, due to COSC certification of all their watches in 2000. ?

Is my assumption correct or did they already changed in 1999 ?

I am asking as i am selling a Chronomat Vitesse and want to give the buyer an as close as possible build date .

Papers btw are signed june 2001 but sell date has little bearing on the build date

Thanks
Rene

_________________
"I spent most of my money on Booze, Breitling and Boats. The rest I wasted" - mostly Elmore Leonard


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sun Dec 29, 2013 11:39 am 
Offline
Contributing Moderator
Contributing Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 5:09 am
Posts: 36521
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 489 posts
Location: Ontario, Canada
Not all models changed at the same time, and both were sold for a period, there were some COSC pieces in 99 I believe. The case should be dated by that period to give you a more accurate date - http://www.breitlingsource.com/articles_dating.shtml


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sun Dec 29, 2013 11:45 am 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member

Joined: Fri Oct 09, 2009 8:58 am
Posts: 3171
Likes: 294 posts
Liked in: 534 posts
Location: Santa Marta colombia on our way to french polynesia
Sadly the 'older' Chronomats do not have the date between the lugs , i believe this started somewhere in '03 or '04 ?

But thanks Roff, I think best guess, based on the ref , is 1999-2000 for the one I have here

_________________
"I spent most of my money on Booze, Breitling and Boats. The rest I wasted" - mostly Elmore Leonard


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sun Dec 29, 2013 11:54 am 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member

Joined: Fri Oct 09, 2009 8:58 am
Posts: 3171
Likes: 294 posts
Liked in: 534 posts
Location: Santa Marta colombia on our way to french polynesia
P.s , watch in question is this ,model

Image

Image

_________________
"I spent most of my money on Booze, Breitling and Boats. The rest I wasted" - mostly Elmore Leonard


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Dec 31, 2013 3:38 pm 
Offline
King of Ling
King of Ling
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 05, 2007 11:07 am
Posts: 1501
Likes: 302 posts
Liked in: 338 posts
Location: Texas
Dracha wrote:
Sadly the 'older' Chronomats do not have the date between the lugs , i believe this started somewhere in '03 or '04 ?

But thanks Roff, I think best guess, based on the ref , is 1999-2000 for the one I have here
Hi, Rene'. To help confirm your assertion, even though your specific blue dial Chronomat Vitesse is featured in both "Chronolog 3" (published Oct 98 for the 1999 model year) and "Chronolog 2000" (published Oct 99 for the 2000 model year) the first mention of chronometre certification is in the latter. I suspect that the very earliest possible manufacture date for your watch was sometime late 1999 but obviously no later a manufacture date than toward the end of 2000 because the Vitesse was discontinued for the 2001 model year. The Chronologs pretty much narrow down the possible dates in this case. Interestingly, the word "Chronometre" doesn't appear on the dial of the 2000 vintage Chronomats but appears on dials of the 2001 models (by then all "GT's" actually) in contrast to the Crosswind and Blackbird Chronomats which have "Chronometre" on the dial in the 2000 Chronolog. Possibly in conjuction with that statement, my 2000 Chronomat Crosswind B13355 did indeed have the date engraved between the interhorns. Maybe the Chronomat's didn't have the interhorn date engraving until 2001 as the dials were not marked "Chronometre" until that model year?... That said, based on my Crosswind and my late wife's friend's Windrider "B-Class". the interhorn dating was indeed started in 2000. :?

Wishing you a safe, happy and prosperous new year my friend. :D
Kind Regards,
Ron

PS. IMO you should definitely use 2000 as the manufacture date for your sale because that assertion is supported by the published Chronolog information. :)

_________________
"The Sailor Who Fell From Grace With The Sea"...

Click to view: 500px Photo Gallery "Flow" or... 500px Photo Gallery or... Breitling Pics Slideshow


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 5 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 8 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 75 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
 




Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group