The Breitling Watch Source Forums

Breitling Watch Information Forums, Navitimer, Chronomat
It is currently Fri May 10, 2024 6:17 pm

All times are UTC - 8 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 12 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Lovely Dial
PostPosted: Tue Dec 21, 2010 5:18 am 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 22, 2007 6:43 pm
Posts: 3332
Likes: 116 posts
Liked in: 414 posts
Having a little harder time with the "nos" part.

http://cgi.ebay.com/18-K-GOLD-BREITLING-DATORA-799-MOONPHASE-1947-N-O-S-/270678615352?pt=FR_YO_BijouxMontres_Montres&hash=item3f05b3e538


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Lovely Dial
PostPosted: Tue Dec 21, 2010 5:48 am 
Offline
Contributing Moderator
Contributing Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 5:09 am
Posts: 36521
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 489 posts
Location: Ontario, Canada
vintage wrote:



Not to mention the price part :wowzers

Would like to see a better photo of that bridge too.........


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Lovely Dial
PostPosted: Tue Dec 21, 2010 5:57 am 
Offline
Breitling Connoisseur
Breitling Connoisseur

Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2010 12:52 pm
Posts: 609
Likes: 7 posts
Liked in: 0 post
case back engraving looks slightly ''after market'' or should that be ''down market''?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Lovely Dial
PostPosted: Tue Dec 21, 2010 6:10 am 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 22, 2007 6:43 pm
Posts: 3332
Likes: 116 posts
Liked in: 414 posts
Not sure that signed crown is correct for 1947 either and it sure doesn't look nos.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Lovely Dial
PostPosted: Tue Dec 21, 2010 6:15 am 
Offline
Contributing Moderator
Contributing Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 5:09 am
Posts: 36521
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 489 posts
Location: Ontario, Canada
vintage wrote:
Not sure that signed crown is correct for 1947 either and it sure doesn't look nos.



Crown is definitely wrong.

I suspect that the photos are deliberate to highlight the strengths and attempt to hide the weaknesses.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Lovely Dial
PostPosted: Tue Dec 21, 2010 6:18 am 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 22, 2007 6:43 pm
Posts: 3332
Likes: 116 posts
Liked in: 414 posts
Roffensian wrote:
vintage wrote:
Not sure that signed crown is correct for 1947 either and it sure doesn't look nos.



Crown is definitely wrong.

I suspect that the photos are deliberate to highlight the strengths and attempt to hide the weaknesses.


Hey, maybe he might be willing to negotiate €10,000! :twisted:


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Lovely Dial
PostPosted: Tue Dec 21, 2010 6:22 am 
Offline
Contributing Moderator
Contributing Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 5:09 am
Posts: 36521
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 489 posts
Location: Ontario, Canada
vintage wrote:
Roffensian wrote:
vintage wrote:
Not sure that signed crown is correct for 1947 either and it sure doesn't look nos.



Crown is definitely wrong.

I suspect that the photos are deliberate to highlight the strengths and attempt to hide the weaknesses.


Hey, maybe he might be willing to negotiate €10,000! :twisted:



If he would throw in a 1952 one owner 806 with full B&P including original sales receipt I might do that deal :lol: :wink:


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Lovely Dial
PostPosted: Tue Dec 21, 2010 6:26 am 
Offline
Breitling Connoisseur
Breitling Connoisseur

Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2010 12:52 pm
Posts: 609
Likes: 7 posts
Liked in: 0 post
I've always wondered when Breitling first started using signed crowns on the chrono's, ?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Lovely Dial
PostPosted: Tue Dec 21, 2010 12:52 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 22, 2007 6:43 pm
Posts: 3332
Likes: 116 posts
Liked in: 414 posts
It was just pointed out to me that you shouldn't see both Fab Suisse and Swiss Made on the same dial but if you look carefully you can see at the very bottom of the dial 'Swiss Made'. So I guess we can assume the dials a redo also? Guess I'll have to reduce my offer significantly. :)

Image


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Lovely Dial
PostPosted: Tue Dec 21, 2010 4:30 pm 
Offline
Contributing Moderator
Contributing Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 5:09 am
Posts: 36521
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 489 posts
Location: Ontario, Canada
Must be - I missed the Swiss Made first time out. It's a very good redial though.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Dec 21, 2010 10:37 pm 
Offline
Breitling Fanatic
Breitling Fanatic

Joined: Sun Feb 22, 2009 6:10 pm
Posts: 374
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 1 post
. . . it's a moonphase at all. The model 799 in my 1946 catalog just has a date wheel/register at 12. And why is there 1964 paperwork for a 1947 watch?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Dec 22, 2010 5:33 am 
Offline
Contributing Moderator
Contributing Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 5:09 am
Posts: 36521
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 489 posts
Location: Ontario, Canada
Bill in Sacramento wrote:
. . . it's a moonphase at all. The model 799 in my 1946 catalog just has a date wheel/register at 12. And why is there 1964 paperwork for a 1947 watch?



I think that the paperwork is from service, it's a one year guarantee.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 12 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 8 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 49 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
 




Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group